Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer: Patients' and health professionals' attitudes, experiences, and evaluation of effects on treatment decision making

  • Marijke R Wevers
  • , Neil K. Aaronson
  • , Eveline M A Bleiker
  • , Daniela E E Hahn
  • , Titia Brouwer
  • , Thijs van Dalen
  • , Evert B. Theunissen
  • , Bart Van Ooijen
  • , Marnix A. J. de Roos
  • , Paul J. Borgstein
  • , Bart C. Vrouenraets
  • , Eline Vriens
  • , Wim H. Bouma
  • , Herman Rijna
  • , Johannes P. Vente
  • , Marianne A Kuenen
  • , Jacoline van der Sanden-Melis
  • , Arjen J Witkamp
  • , Emiel J. Th. Rutgers
  • , Senno Verhoef
  • Margreet G E M Ausems*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Rapid genetic counseling and testing (RGCT) in newly diagnosed high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients may influence surgical treatment decisions. To successfully integrate RGCT in practice, knowledge of professionals’, and patients’ attitudes toward RGCT is essential. Methods: Between 2008 and 2010, we performed a randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of RGCT. Attitudes toward and experience with RGCT were assessed in 265 patients (at diagnosis, 6- and 12-month follow-up) and 29 medical professionals (before and after the recruitment period). Results: At 6-month follow-up, more patients who had been offered RGCT felt they had been actively involved in treatment decision-making than patients who had been offered usual care (67% vs 48%, P = 0.06). Patients who received DNA-test results before primary surgery reported more often that RGCT influenced treatment decisions than those who received results afterwards (P < 0.01). Eighty-seven percent felt that genetic counseling and testing (GCT) should preferably take place between diagnosis and surgery. Most professionals (72%) agreed that RGCT should be routinely offered to eligible patients. Most patients (74%) and professionals (85%) considered surgeons the most appropriate source for referral. Conclusions: RGCT is viewed as helpful for newly diagnosed high-risk BC patients in choosing their primary surgery and should be offered routinely by surgeons.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1029-1039
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume116
Issue number8
Early online date13 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • breast cancer
  • patient empowerment
  • BRCA1
  • BRCA2
  • genetic counseling and testing
  • Decision Making
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Genetic Testing
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Genetic Counseling
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Aged
  • Breast Neoplasms/genetics
  • Referral and Consultation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer: Patients' and health professionals' attitudes, experiences, and evaluation of effects on treatment decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this