Randomized clinical trial of observational versus antibiotic treatment for a first episode of CT-proven uncomplicated acute diverticulitis

  • L. Daniels*
  • , Ünlü
  • , N. de Korte
  • , S. van Dieren
  • , H. B. Stockmann
  • , B. C. Vrouenraets
  • , E. C. Consten
  • , J. A. van der Hoeven
  • , Q. A. Eijsbouts
  • , I. F. Faneyte
  • , W. A. Bemelman
  • , M. G. Dijkgraaf
  • , M. A. Boermeester
  • , C. E M Glaap
  • , A. Croonen
  • , M. A. Cuesta
  • , J. Kuijvenhoven
  • , R. Buijsman
  • , S. Den Uil
  • , P. R. De Reuver
  • J. B. Tuynman, B. J M Van de Wall, M. A W Stam, R. M H Roumen, W. Truin, R. Wijn, M. F. Gerhards, K. F D Kuhlmann, E. S. Van der Zaag, J. E. Biemond, R. J. Klicks, N. Dhar, H. A. Cense, G. H. De Groot, Y. Pikoulin, G. H. Van Ramshorst, L. L. Hoornweg, L. Koet, A. A W Van Geloven, M. Emous, A. T P M Claassen, S. Mollink, D. J A Sonneveld, L. Bouvé, G. M P Diepenhorst, W. J. Vles, B. R. Toorenvliet, J. F. Lange, G. H H Mannaerts, B. A. Grotenhuis, R. J De Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, E. B. Deerenberg, A. C T M Depla, S. Bruin, X. Vos, J. J G Scheepers, M. J. Boom, D. Boerma, S. Van Esser, J. Pruim, J. B. Reitsma
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Antibiotics are advised in most guidelines on acute diverticulitis, despite a lack of evidence to support their routine use. This trial compared the effectiveness of a strategy with or without antibiotics for a first episode of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Methods: Patients with CT-proven, primary, left-sided, uncomplicated, acute diverticulitis were included at 22 clinical sites in the Netherlands, and assigned randomly to an observational or antibiotic treatment strategy. The primary endpoint was time to recovery during 6 months of follow-up. Main secondary endpoints were readmission rate, complicated, ongoing and recurrent diverticulitis, sigmoid resection and mortality. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done. Results: A total of 528 patients were included. Median time to recovery was 14 (i.q.r. 6–35) days for the observational and 12 (7–30) days for the antibiotic treatment strategy, with a hazard ratio for recovery of 0·91 (lower limit of 1-sided 95 per cent c.i. 0·78; P = 0·151). No significant differences between the observation and antibiotic treatment groups were found for secondary endpoints: complicated diverticulitis (3·8 versus 2·6 per cent respectively; P = 0·377), ongoing diverticulitis (7·3 versus 4·1 per cent; P = 0·183), recurrent diverticulitis (3·4 versus 3·0 per cent; P = 0·494), sigmoid resection (3·8 versus 2·3 per cent; P = 0·323), readmission (17·6 versus 12·0 per cent; P = 0·148), adverse events (48·5 versus 54·5 per cent; P = 0·221) and mortality (1·1 versus 0·4 per cent; P = 0·432). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the observation group (2 versus 3 days; P = 0·006). Per-protocol analyses were concordant with the intention-to-treat analyses. Conclusion: Observational treatment without antibiotics did not prolong recovery and can be considered appropriate in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis. Registration number: NCT01111253 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)52-61
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume104
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized clinical trial of observational versus antibiotic treatment for a first episode of CT-proven uncomplicated acute diverticulitis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this