Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

R-miniCHOP versus R-CHOP in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A propensity matched population-based study

  • D. Al-Sarayfi
  • , M. Brink
  • , M. E.D. Chamuleau
  • , R. Brouwer
  • , R. S. van Rijn
  • , D. Issa
  • , W. Deenik
  • , G. Huls
  • , R. Mous
  • , J. S.P. Vermaat
  • , A. Diepstra
  • , J. M. Zijlstra
  • , T. van Meerten
  • , M. Nijland*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For elderly frail patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), an attenuated chemo-immunotherapy strategy of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-miniCHOP) was introduced as a treatment option as from 2014 onward in the Netherlands. Although R-miniCHOP is more tolerable, reduction of chemotherapy could negatively affect survival compared to R-CHOP. The aim of this analysis was to assess survival of patients treated with R-miniCHOP compared to R-CHOP. DLBCL patients ≥65 years, newly diagnosed in 2014–2020, who received ≥1 cycle of R-miniCHOP or R-CHOP were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry, with survival follow-up through 2022. Patients were propensity-score-matched for baseline characteristics. Main endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and relative survival (RS). The use of R-miniCHOP in DLBCL increased from 2% in 2014 to 15% in 2020. In total, 384 patients treated with R-miniCHOP and 384 patients treated with R-CHOP were included for comparison (median age; 81 years, stage 3–4; 68%). The median number of R-(mini)CHOP cycles was 6 (range, 1–8). The 2-year PFS, OS and RS were inferior for patients treated with R-miniCHOP compared to R-CHOP (PFS 51% vs. 68%, p <.01; OS 60% vs. 75%, p <.01; RS 69% vs. 86%, p <.01). In multivariable analysis, patients treated with R-miniCHOP had higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to patients treated with R-CHOP (HR 1.73; 95%CI, 1.39–2.17). R-miniCHOP is effective for most elderly patients. Although survival is inferior compared to R-CHOP, the use of R-miniCHOP as initial treatment is increasing. Therefore, fitness needs to be carefully weighed in treatment selection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-222
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of hematology
Volume99
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'R-miniCHOP versus R-CHOP in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A propensity matched population-based study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this