Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantification of mammographic masking risk with volumetric breast density maps: How to select women for supplemental screening

  • Katharina Holland*
  • , Carla H. Van Gils
  • , Johanna O P Wanders
  • , Ritse M. Mann
  • , Nico Karssemeijer
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The sensitivity of mammograms is low for women with dense breasts, since cancers may be masked by dense tissue. In this study, we investigated methods to identify women with density patterns associated with a high masking risk. Risk measures are derived from volumetric breast density maps. We used the last negative screening mammograms of 93 women who subsequently presented with an interval cancer (IC), and, as controls, 930 randomly selected normal screening exams from women without cancer. Volumetric breast density maps were computed from the mammograms, which provide the dense tissue thickness at each location. These were used to compute absolute and percentage glandular tissue volume. We modeled the masking risk for each pixel location using the absolute and percentage dense tissue thickness and we investigated the effect of taking the cancer location probability distribution (CLPD) into account. For each method, we selected cases with the highest masking measure (by thresholding) and computed the fraction of ICs as a function of the fraction of controls selected. The latter can be interpreted as the negative supplemental screening rate (NSSR). Between the models, when incorporating CLPD, no significant differences were found. In general, the methods performed better when CLPD was included. At higher NSSRs some of the investigated masking measures had a significantly higher performance than volumetric breast density. These measures may therefore serve as an alternative to identify women with a high risk for a masked cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMedical Imaging 2016: Computer-Aided Diagnosis
EditorsGeorgia D. Tourassi, Samuel G. Armato
PublisherSPIE
ISBN (Electronic)9781510600201
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventMedical Imaging 2016: Computer-Aided Diagnosis - San Diego, United States
Duration: 28 Feb 20162 Mar 2016

Publication series

NameProceedings of SPIE
Volume9785
ISSN (Print)1605-7422
ISSN (Electronic)2410-9045
NameProgress in biomedical optics and imaging
Number40
Volume17

Conference

ConferenceMedical Imaging 2016: Computer-Aided Diagnosis
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Diego
Period28/02/162/03/16

Keywords

  • Breast density
  • Density map
  • Interval cancers
  • Masking risk
  • Supplemental screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantification of mammographic masking risk with volumetric breast density maps: How to select women for supplemental screening'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this