Quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence in T1 colorectal cancer patients treated with endoscopic or surgical tumor resection

Hao Dang, Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Sarita M S van der Zwaan, M Elske van den Akker-van Marle, Henderik L van Westreenen, Yara Backes, Leon M G Moons, Fabian A Holman, Koen C M J Peeters, Jolein van der Kraan, Alexandra M J Langers, Willem M Lijfering, James C H Hardwick, Jurjen J Boonstra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To optimize therapeutic decision-making in early invasive colorectal cancer (T1 CRC) patients, it is important to elicit the patient's perspective next to considering medical outcome. Because empirical data on patient-reported impact of different treatment options are lacking, we evaluated patients' quality of life, perceived time to recovery, and fear of cancer recurrence after endoscopic or surgical treatment for T1 CRC.

METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we selected patients with histologically confirmed T1 CRC who participated in the Dutch Bowel Cancer Screening Programme and received endoscopic or surgical treatment between January 2014 and July 2017. Quality of life was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment 30-item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and the 5-level EuroQoL 5-dimension questionnaire. We used the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) to evaluate patients' fear of cancer recurrence. A question on perceived time to recovery after treatment was also included in the set of questionnaires sent to patients.

RESULTS: Of all 119 eligible patients, 92.4% responded to the questionnaire (endoscopy group, 55/62; surgery group, 55/57). Compared with the surgery group, perceived time to recovery was on average 3 months shorter in endoscopically treated patients after adjustment for confounders (19.9 days vs 111.3 days; P = .001). The 2 treatment groups were comparable with regard to global quality of life, functioning domains, and symptom severity scores. Moreover, patients in the endoscopy group did not report more fear of cancer recurrence than those in the surgery group (CWS score, 0-40; endoscopy 7.6 vs surgery 9.7; P = .140).

CONCLUSIONS: From the patient's perspective, endoscopic treatment provides a quicker recovery than surgery, without provoking more fear of cancer recurrence or any deterioration in quality of life. These results contribute to the shared therapeutic decision-making process of clinicians and T1 CRC patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)533-544
Number of pages12
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume89
Issue number3
Early online date28 Sept 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Carcinoma/pathology
  • Clinical Decision-Making
  • Colonoscopy/methods
  • Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology
  • Convalescence/psychology
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods
  • Fear/psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Linear Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/psychology
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Quality of Life/psychology
  • Time Factors
  • Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of life and fear of cancer recurrence in T1 colorectal cancer patients treated with endoscopic or surgical tumor resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this