Quality assurance and the need to evaluate interventions and audit programme outcomes

Min Zhao, Ilonca Vaartjes, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Kornelia Kotseva, Catriona Jennings, Diederick E Grobbee, Ian Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical guidelines provide standards for the provision of healthcare. However, these guidelines have been poorly implemented in daily practice. Clinical audit is a quality improvement tool to promote quality of care in daily practice and to improve outcomes through the systematic review of care delivery and implementation of changes. A major priority in the management of subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD) management is secondary prevention by controlling cardiovascular risk factors and providing appropriate medical treatment. Clinical audits can be applied to monitor modifiable risk factors and evaluate quality improvements of CVD management in daily practice. Existing clinical audits have provided an overview of the burden of risk factors in subjects with CVD and reflect real-world risk factor recording and management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-128
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Audit
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Quality assessment
  • Secondary prevention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality assurance and the need to evaluate interventions and audit programme outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this