TY - JOUR
T1 - Pulmonary nodule volumetry at different low computed tomography radiation dose levels with hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction
T2 - A within patient analysis
AU - Den Harder, Annemarie M.
AU - Willemink, Martin J.
AU - Van Hamersvelt, Robbert W.
AU - Vonken, EPA
AU - Schilham, Arnold M R
AU - Lammers, Jan Willem J
AU - Luijk, Bart
AU - Budde, Ricardo P J
AU - Leiner, Tim
AU - De Jong, Pim A.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Objective The aim of the study was to determine the effects of dose reduction and iterative reconstruction (IR) on pulmonary nodule volumetry. Methods In this prospective study, 25 patients scheduled for follow-up of pulmonary nodules were included. Computed tomography acquisitions were acquired at 4 dose levels with a median of 2.1, 1.2, 0.8, and 0.6 mSv. Data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid IR, and model-based IR. Volumetry was performed using semiautomatic software. Results At the highest dose level, more than 91% (34/37) of the nodules could be segmented, and at the lowest dose level, this was more than 83%. Thirty-three nodules were included for further analysis. Filtered back projection and hybrid IR did not lead to significant differences, whereas model-based IR resulted in lower volume measurements with a maximum difference of -11% compared with FBP at routine dose. Conclusions Pulmonary nodule volumetry can be accurately performed at a submillisievert dose with both FBP and hybrid IR.
AB - Objective The aim of the study was to determine the effects of dose reduction and iterative reconstruction (IR) on pulmonary nodule volumetry. Methods In this prospective study, 25 patients scheduled for follow-up of pulmonary nodules were included. Computed tomography acquisitions were acquired at 4 dose levels with a median of 2.1, 1.2, 0.8, and 0.6 mSv. Data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid IR, and model-based IR. Volumetry was performed using semiautomatic software. Results At the highest dose level, more than 91% (34/37) of the nodules could be segmented, and at the lowest dose level, this was more than 83%. Thirty-three nodules were included for further analysis. Filtered back projection and hybrid IR did not lead to significant differences, whereas model-based IR resulted in lower volume measurements with a maximum difference of -11% compared with FBP at routine dose. Conclusions Pulmonary nodule volumetry can be accurately performed at a submillisievert dose with both FBP and hybrid IR.
KW - chest CT
KW - iterative reconstruction
KW - low dose
KW - pulmonary nodule
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964402904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000408
DO - 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000408
M3 - Article
C2 - 27096400
AN - SCOPUS:84964402904
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 40
SP - 578
EP - 583
JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
IS - 4
ER -