Prognostic Value of Geriatric 8 and Identification of Seniors at Risk for Hospitalized Patients Screening Tools for Patients With Lung Cancer

Karlijn J G Schulkes, Esteban T D Souwer, Leontine J R van Elden, Henk Codrington, Simone van der Sar-van der Brugge, Jan-Willem J Lammers, Johanneke E A Portielje, Frederiek van den Bos, Marije E Hamaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We analyzed the predictive value of the Geriatric 8 (G8) and Identification of Seniors at Risk for Hospitalized Patients (ISAR-HP) in 142 elderly patients with lung cancer. Potentially frail patients, identified by an impaired G8 or ISAR-HP, had a significantly greater risk of 1-year mortality. Using the ISAR-HP as the only screening tool would be insufficient; however, an impaired ISAR-HP and G8 would lead to fine tuning the selection of patients with multiple geriatric impairments. Background Because of the time-consuming aspect of geriatric assessments, cancer specialists are seeking shorter screening tools to distinguish fit and frail patients. We analyzed the predictive value of the Geriatric 8 (G8) and Identification of Seniors at Risk for Hospitalized Patients (ISAR-HP) in elderly patients with lung cancer. Patients and Methods From January 2014 to April 2016, the data from patients with lung cancer aged > 70 years at 2 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands were included in a database. The patients were classified as potentially frail if they had a G8 of ≤ 14 or ISAR-HP of ≥ 2. Results Of the 142 included patients (median age, 77 years; interquartile range, 73-82 years), 108 (76%) were potentially frail. After correction for possible confounders, the potentially frail patients had a significantly greater risk of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 4.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-9.99; P =.02). Higher disease stage (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.40-2.12; P <.001) was also a significant predictor of mortality; however, initial treatment (standard or otherwise) and age were not. When using both screening instruments separately, an impaired score on the G8 and higher disease stage were the variables remaining in the regression analyses (HR for impaired G8, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.35-6.72; P <.001). Patients with impaired scores on the ISAR-HP and G8 had more geriatric impairments than did patients with only an impaired G8 score. Conclusion G8 screening is useful for the prognostication of elderly patients with lung cancer and could be used in combination with ISAR-HP to increase specificity at the cost of sensitivity. Using the ISAR-HP as the only screening tool would be insufficient.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)660-+
JournalClinical lung cancer
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • Pulmonary malignancies
  • Prognostication
  • NSCLC
  • Toxicity
  • Frail

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic Value of Geriatric 8 and Identification of Seniors at Risk for Hospitalized Patients Screening Tools for Patients With Lung Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this