Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prognostic stratification of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (PROSPECT): A cardiac magnetic resonance study

  • Gianluca Pontone*
  • , Andrea I. Guaricci
  • , Daniele Andreini
  • , Giovanni Ferro
  • , Marco Guglielmo
  • , Andrea Baggiano
  • , Laura Fusini
  • , Giuseppe Muscogiuri
  • , Valentina Lorenzoni
  • , Saima Mushtaq
  • , Edoardo Conte
  • , Andrea Annoni
  • , Alberto Formenti
  • , Maria Elisabetta Mancini
  • , Patrizia Carità
  • , Massimo Verdecchia
  • , Silvia Pica
  • , Fabio Fazzari
  • , Nicola Cosentino
  • , Giancarlo Marenzi
  • Mark G. Rabbat, Piergiuseppe Agostoni, Antonio L. Bartorelli, Mauro Pepi, Pier Giorgio Masci
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Background-Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a robust tool to evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial salvage index, microvascular obstruction, and myocardial hemorrhage in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. We evaluated the additional prognostic benefit of a CMR score over standard prognostic stratification with global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) score and transthoracic echocardiography LVEF measurement. Methods and Results-Two hundred nine consecutive patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (age, 61.4±11.4 years; 162 men) underwent transthoracic echocardiography and CMR after succesful primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 2.5±1.2 years. MACE occurred in 24 (12%) patients who at baseline showed higher GRACE risk score (P<0.01), lower LVEF with both transthoracic echocardiography and CMR, lower myocardial salvage index, and higher per-patient myocardial hemorrhage and microvascular obstruction prevalence and amount as compared with patients without MACE (P<0.01). The best cut-off values of transthoracic echocardiography-LVEF, CMR-LVEF, myocardial salvage index, and microvascular obstruction to predict MACE were 46.7%, 37.5%, 0.4, and 2.6% of left ventricular mass, respectively. Accordingly, a weighted CMR score, including the following 4 variables (CMR-LVEF, myocardial salvage index, microvascular obstruction, and myocardial hemorrhage), with a maximum of 17 points was calculated and included in the multivariable analysis showing that only CMR score (hazard ratio, 1.867 per SD increase [1.311-2.658]; P<0.001) was independently associated with MACE with the highest net reclassification improvement as compared to GRACE score and transthoracic echocardiography-LVEF measurement. Conclusions-CMR score provides incremental prognostic stratification as compared with GRACE score and transthoracic echocardiography-LVEF and may impact the management of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere006428
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume10
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Magnetic resonance
  • Prognosis
  • ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic stratification of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (PROSPECT): A cardiac magnetic resonance study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this