Prognostic Relevance of Palliative Primary Tumor Removal: Why Randomized Controlled Data Are Still Mandatory

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Access to Document

@article{b525f2b1c02946739cad36762725d835,

title = "Prognostic Relevance of Palliative Primary Tumor Removal: Why Randomized Controlled Data Are Still Mandatory",

author = "Jorine Tlam-Boer and \{De Wilt\}, Hans and Miriam Koopman",

year = "2017",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000001279",

language = "English",

volume = "265",

pages = "e58--e59",

journal = "Annals of Surgery",

issn = "0003-4932",

publisher = "Wolters Kluwer Health",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic Relevance of Palliative Primary Tumor Removal

T2 - Why Randomized Controlled Data Are Still Mandatory

AU - Tlam-Boer, Jorine

AU - De Wilt, Hans

AU - Koopman, Miriam

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84939419890

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001279

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001279

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 26079916

SN - 0003-4932

VL - 265

SP - e58-e59

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

IS - 4

ER -