TY - JOUR
T1 - Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting
AU - Schwab, Andrea
AU - Levato, Riccardo
AU - D'Este, Matteo
AU - Piluso, Susanna
AU - Eglin, David
AU - Malda, Jos
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is part of the osteochondral defect collaborative research program supported by the AO foundation. The Graubünden Innovationsstiftung, the Dutch Arthritis Society (LLP-12 and LLP-22), and the Gravitation Program “Materials Driven Regeneration”, funded by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (024.003.013), are acknowledged for their financial support.
Funding Information:
This work is part of the osteochondral defect collaborative research program supported by the AO foundation. The Graub?nden Innovationsstiftung, the Dutch Arthritis Society (LLP-12 and LLP-22) and the Gravitation Program "Materials Driven Regeneration" funded by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (024.003.013) are acknowledged for their financial support.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2020/10/14
Y1 - 2020/10/14
N2 - Three-dimensional bioprinting uses additive manufacturing techniques for the automated fabrication of hierarchically organized living constructs. The building blocks are often hydrogel-based bioinks, which need to be printed into structures with high shape fidelity to the intended computer-aided design. For optimal cell performance, relatively soft and printable inks are preferred, although these undergo significant deformation during the printing process, which may impair shape fidelity. While the concept of good or poor printability seems rather intuitive, its quantitative definition lacks consensus and depends on multiple rheological and chemical parameters of the ink. This review discusses qualitative and quantitative methodologies to evaluate printability of bioinks for extrusion- and lithography-based bioprinting. The physicochemical parameters influencing shape fidelity are discussed, together with their importance in establishing new models, predictive tools and printing methods that are deemed instrumental for the design of next-generation bioinks, and for reproducible comparison of their structural performance.
AB - Three-dimensional bioprinting uses additive manufacturing techniques for the automated fabrication of hierarchically organized living constructs. The building blocks are often hydrogel-based bioinks, which need to be printed into structures with high shape fidelity to the intended computer-aided design. For optimal cell performance, relatively soft and printable inks are preferred, although these undergo significant deformation during the printing process, which may impair shape fidelity. While the concept of good or poor printability seems rather intuitive, its quantitative definition lacks consensus and depends on multiple rheological and chemical parameters of the ink. This review discusses qualitative and quantitative methodologies to evaluate printability of bioinks for extrusion- and lithography-based bioprinting. The physicochemical parameters influencing shape fidelity are discussed, together with their importance in establishing new models, predictive tools and printing methods that are deemed instrumental for the design of next-generation bioinks, and for reproducible comparison of their structural performance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092012710&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084
DO - 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32856892
SN - 0009-2665
VL - 120
SP - 11028
EP - 11055
JO - Chemical reviews
JF - Chemical reviews
IS - 19
ER -