Primary Care Provision at the End of Life in Cancer: Care Provision, Continuity and Associations with Hospital Service Usage and Quality Indicators of End of Life Care

Matthew Grant, Damien McCarthy, Chris Kearney, Anna Collins, Vijaya Sundararajan, Joel Rhee, Jennifer Philip, Jon Emery

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractAcademic

Abstract

Background/aims: The final six months of a person’s life are the most resource intensive in terms of health system usage, with 80% of this expenditure occurring in hospital. Whilst there are considerable data examining hospital service provision, there is little known regarding associated usage of primary care services in the Australian setting. Objective: This project aims to explore how primary care involvement affects health service usage and quality of life for cancer patients in the last year of life.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study using linked routine care and administrative data from two hospital networks, primary care and national death certificate. Patients were included who were diagnosed with cancer and died from a cause related to cancer between January 2007 - 2017.
Results: A total of 758 patients were included who had linked records from all sources and died from a cancer related cause. General practi- tioners were closely involved in care during this period, with 88% of patients visiting their GP during the last six-months (mean 9.1 consulta- tions). These visits became more frequent in the last stages of life, with 59% of patients consulting their GP in the last month of life, and 60% the month prior. This care was largely appropriate, with 45% of patients pre- scribed pain medication, and few requests for imaging (3%) and pathol- ogy (9%) in the last month.
Two cohorts were defined on their patterns of GP usage: cohort 1 (n=387) having regular consultations, and cohort 2 (n=371) not having this regularity. The first cohort were older (73.7 vs 67.3yrs, p<0.001) and had more comorbidities (mean 1.1 vs 0.77, p=0.002). Secondary health care usage was alike through both cohorts: admissions in the last three (median 1 [1-2] vs 1[0-2]) and one (med 1[0-1] vs 1[0-1]) month. Rates of indicators of quality end of life care were similar, including palliative care referral (61% vs 59%), and chemotherapy (5% vs 3%), surgery (7% vs 6%) and emergency department use (45% vs 43%) in the last month. Patients in the regular care cohort had longer admissions at 3 months (med 5. [2.8-11.0] vs 4.5[2.0-9.1] bed days per admission, p=0.014), but this dif- ference was not significant in the last month of life (med 5.7[2.0-11.0] vs 4.7[2.0-10.0], p=0.312).
Conclusions: The results demonstrate that these two cohorts have simi- lar patterns of health care usage and indicators of quality end-of-life care. This is despite the first cohort being older and increased comorbid conditions, and thus may have been expected to have more frequent and extended admissions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages27
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 19 May 2022
Externally publishedYes
EventEuropean Association of Palliative Care World Research Congress -
Duration: 18 May 202220 May 2022

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Association of Palliative Care World Research Congress
Abbreviated titleEAPC 2022
Period18/05/2220/05/22

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Primary Care Provision at the End of Life in Cancer: Care Provision, Continuity and Associations with Hospital Service Usage and Quality Indicators of End of Life Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this