Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prediction meets causal inference: the role of treatment in clinical prediction models

  • Nan van Geloven*
  • , Sonja A. Swanson
  • , Chava L. Ramspek
  • , Kim Luijken
  • , Merel van Diepen
  • , Tim P. Morris
  • , Rolf H.H. Groenwold
  • , Hans C. van Houwelingen
  • , Hein Putter
  • , Saskia le Cessie
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

In this paper we study approaches for dealing with treatment when developing a clinical prediction model. Analogous to the estimand framework recently proposed by the European Medicines Agency for clinical trials, we propose a ‘predictimand’ framework of different questions that may be of interest when predicting risk in relation to treatment started after baseline. We provide a formal definition of the estimands matching these questions, give examples of settings in which each is useful and discuss appropriate estimators including their assumptions. We illustrate the impact of the predictimand choice in a dataset of patients with end-stage kidney disease. We argue that clearly defining the estimand is equally important in prediction research as in causal inference.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)619-630
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Epidemiology
Volume35
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Censoring
  • Clinical prediction model
  • Estimands
  • Predictimands
  • Treatment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction meets causal inference: the role of treatment in clinical prediction models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this