Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predicting ulcer-free survival using the discriminative value of screening test locations

  • Willem D. Rinkel*
  • , Mark J.W. van der Oest
  • , Don A. Dijkstra
  • , Manuel Castro Cabezas
  • , Jan Hendrik Coert
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines recommend screening the feet of diabetic subjects with a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork. We investigated which tests and locations on the feet have the best predictive value regarding 1-year ulcer-free survival in diabetic subjects participating in the prospective Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study. Methods: Decision tree analysis was used to predict ulcer-free survival based on responses from individual test locations (monofilaments on 10 sites, vibration sense was tested on both halluces and medial malleoli). Separate trees for patients with and without a history of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) were developed. Results: Four hundred sixteen subjects (mean [SD] age, 61.8 years [12.4]; range, 21.6-90.2) were measured, of whom 24 developed new DFUs. Three tests exhibited discriminative and predictive properties: testing vibration sense on the medial malleolus and monofilament testing on heel and hallux. The decision tree to predict ulcer-free survival in patients with a history of DFU yielded a sensitivity of 87.0%, which was 99.6% for the tree of patients without a history of DFU. Conclusion: The findings of this study aids medical decision making by discriminating between high- and low-risk patients of developing DFU using selective testing on sites with predictive properties.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere3119
JournalDiabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • decision making
  • diabetic foot ulcer
  • prediction
  • risk assessment
  • sensory testing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting ulcer-free survival using the discriminative value of screening test locations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this