TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting the Risk of Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients With COVID-19 Presenting in the Emergency Room
T2 - Development and Evaluation of the Confusion, Respiratory Rate, Oxygen Saturation With or Without Concurrent Supplemental Oxygen, and Oxygen Supplementation Score
AU - Xiang, Weiwei
AU - Steinbeis, Fridolin
AU - Dhindsa, Kiret
AU - Kurth, Florian
AU - Lingscheid, Tilman
AU - Thibeault, Charlotte
AU - Meyer, Hans Jakob
AU - Suttorp, Norbert
AU - Mittermaier, Mirja
AU - Stecher, Melanie
AU - Scherer, Margarete
AU - Hagen, Marina
AU - Mitrov, Lazar
AU - Geisler, Ramsia
AU - Appel, Katharina S.
AU - Hopff, Sina M.
AU - Koll, Carolin
AU - Nunes De Miranda, Susana M.
AU - Weismantel, Christina
AU - Reese, Jens Peter
AU - Heuschmann, Peter
AU - Miljukov, Olga
AU - Nürnberger, Carolin
AU - Sander, Leif Erik
AU - Vehreschild, Jörg Janne
AU - Witzenrath, Martin
AU - Van Smeden, Maarten
AU - Zoller, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/5/15
Y1 - 2025/5/15
N2 - Background Existing risk evaluation tools underperform in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to develop and evaluate an accurate and calculator-free clinical tool for predicting ICU admission at emergency room (ER) presentation. Methods Data from patients with COVID-19 in a nationwide German cohort (March 2020-January 2023) were analyzed. Candidate predictors were selected based on literature and clinical expertise. A risk score, predicting ICU admission within seven days of ER presentation, was developed using elastic net logistic regression on a northern German cohort (derivation cohort), evaluated on a southern German cohort (evaluation cohort), and externally validated on a Colombian cohort. Performance was evaluated through discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility against existing tools. Results ICU admission rates within seven days were 30.8% (derivation cohort, n = 1295, median age 60, 38.1% female), 28.1% (evaluation cohort, n = 1123, median age 58, 36.9% female), and 30.3% (Colombian cohort, n = 780, median age 57, 38.8% female). The 11-point CROSS score, based on Confusion, Respiratory rate, Oxygen Saturation (with or without concurrent supplemental oxygen), and oxygen Supplementation, demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve: 0.77 in the evaluation cohort; 0.69 in the Colombian cohort), good calibration, and superior clinical utility compared to existing tools. Mortality-predicting tools performed poorly in predicting ICU admission risk for patients with COVID-19. Conclusions The calculator-free CROSS score effectively predicts ICU admission for patients with COVID-19 in the ER. Further studies are needed to assess its generalizability in other settings. Mortality-predicting tools are not recommended for ICU admission prediction.
AB - Background Existing risk evaluation tools underperform in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to develop and evaluate an accurate and calculator-free clinical tool for predicting ICU admission at emergency room (ER) presentation. Methods Data from patients with COVID-19 in a nationwide German cohort (March 2020-January 2023) were analyzed. Candidate predictors were selected based on literature and clinical expertise. A risk score, predicting ICU admission within seven days of ER presentation, was developed using elastic net logistic regression on a northern German cohort (derivation cohort), evaluated on a southern German cohort (evaluation cohort), and externally validated on a Colombian cohort. Performance was evaluated through discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility against existing tools. Results ICU admission rates within seven days were 30.8% (derivation cohort, n = 1295, median age 60, 38.1% female), 28.1% (evaluation cohort, n = 1123, median age 58, 36.9% female), and 30.3% (Colombian cohort, n = 780, median age 57, 38.8% female). The 11-point CROSS score, based on Confusion, Respiratory rate, Oxygen Saturation (with or without concurrent supplemental oxygen), and oxygen Supplementation, demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve: 0.77 in the evaluation cohort; 0.69 in the Colombian cohort), good calibration, and superior clinical utility compared to existing tools. Mortality-predicting tools performed poorly in predicting ICU admission risk for patients with COVID-19. Conclusions The calculator-free CROSS score effectively predicts ICU admission for patients with COVID-19 in the ER. Further studies are needed to assess its generalizability in other settings. Mortality-predicting tools are not recommended for ICU admission prediction.
KW - elastic net logistic regression
KW - emergency service
KW - prognosis
KW - respiratory infections
KW - triage
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008121669
U2 - 10.1093/cid/ciaf006
DO - 10.1093/cid/ciaf006
M3 - Article
C2 - 39792903
AN - SCOPUS:105008121669
SN - 1058-4838
VL - 80
SP - 1022
EP - 1031
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
IS - 5
ER -