Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predicting the Risk of Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients With COVID-19 Presenting in the Emergency Room: Development and Evaluation of the Confusion, Respiratory Rate, Oxygen Saturation With or Without Concurrent Supplemental Oxygen, and Oxygen Supplementation Score

  • Weiwei Xiang*
  • , Fridolin Steinbeis
  • , Kiret Dhindsa
  • , Florian Kurth
  • , Tilman Lingscheid
  • , Charlotte Thibeault
  • , Hans Jakob Meyer
  • , Norbert Suttorp
  • , Mirja Mittermaier
  • , Melanie Stecher
  • , Margarete Scherer
  • , Marina Hagen
  • , Lazar Mitrov
  • , Ramsia Geisler
  • , Katharina S. Appel
  • , Sina M. Hopff
  • , Carolin Koll
  • , Susana M. Nunes De Miranda
  • , Christina Weismantel
  • , Jens Peter Reese
  • Peter Heuschmann, Olga Miljukov, Carolin Nürnberger, Leif Erik Sander, Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Martin Witzenrath, Maarten Van Smeden, Thomas Zoller*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Existing risk evaluation tools underperform in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to develop and evaluate an accurate and calculator-free clinical tool for predicting ICU admission at emergency room (ER) presentation. Methods Data from patients with COVID-19 in a nationwide German cohort (March 2020-January 2023) were analyzed. Candidate predictors were selected based on literature and clinical expertise. A risk score, predicting ICU admission within seven days of ER presentation, was developed using elastic net logistic regression on a northern German cohort (derivation cohort), evaluated on a southern German cohort (evaluation cohort), and externally validated on a Colombian cohort. Performance was evaluated through discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility against existing tools. Results ICU admission rates within seven days were 30.8% (derivation cohort, n = 1295, median age 60, 38.1% female), 28.1% (evaluation cohort, n = 1123, median age 58, 36.9% female), and 30.3% (Colombian cohort, n = 780, median age 57, 38.8% female). The 11-point CROSS score, based on Confusion, Respiratory rate, Oxygen Saturation (with or without concurrent supplemental oxygen), and oxygen Supplementation, demonstrated good discrimination (area under the curve: 0.77 in the evaluation cohort; 0.69 in the Colombian cohort), good calibration, and superior clinical utility compared to existing tools. Mortality-predicting tools performed poorly in predicting ICU admission risk for patients with COVID-19. Conclusions The calculator-free CROSS score effectively predicts ICU admission for patients with COVID-19 in the ER. Further studies are needed to assess its generalizability in other settings. Mortality-predicting tools are not recommended for ICU admission prediction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1022-1031
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Infectious Diseases
Volume80
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2025

Keywords

  • elastic net logistic regression
  • emergency service
  • prognosis
  • respiratory infections
  • triage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting the Risk of Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients With COVID-19 Presenting in the Emergency Room: Development and Evaluation of the Confusion, Respiratory Rate, Oxygen Saturation With or Without Concurrent Supplemental Oxygen, and Oxygen Supplementation Score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this