Predicting pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department Evaluation of clinical parameters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this study was to quantify the value of clinical predictors available in the emergency department (ED) in predicting Streptococcus pneumoniae as the cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A prospective, observational, cohort study of patients with CAP presenting in the ED was performed. Pneumococcal aetiology of CAP was based on either bacteraemia, or S.pneumoniae being cultured from sputum, or urinary immunochromatographic assay positivity, or positivity of a novel serotype-specific urinary antigen detection test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors and various cut-off values of probability scores were used to evaluate the usefulness of the model. Three hundred and twenty-eight (31.0%) of 1057 patients with CAP had pneumococcal CAP. Nine independent predictors for pneumococcal pneumonia were identified, but the clinical utility of this prediction model was disappointing, because of low positive predictive values or a small yield. Clinical criteria have insufficient diagnostic capacity to predict pneumococcal CAP. Rapid antigen detection tests are needed to diagnose S.pneumoniae at the time of hospital admission.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1316-1322
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Microbiology and Infection
Volume20
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Keywords

  • Community-acquired pneumonia
  • diagnosis
  • prediction rule
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae
  • urinary antigen test
  • STREPTOCOCCUS-PNEUMONIAE
  • ANTIMICROBIAL-THERAPY
  • HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS
  • ANTIGEN TEST
  • ETIOLOGY
  • GUIDELINES
  • MANAGEMENT
  • ADULTS
  • LEGIONELLA
  • BACTERIAL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department Evaluation of clinical parameters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this