TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images
T2 - The TUPAC16 challenge
AU - Veta, Mitko
AU - Heng, Yujing J.
AU - Stathonikos, Nikolas
AU - Bejnordi, Babak Ehteshami
AU - Beca, Francisco
AU - Wollmann, Thomas
AU - Rohr, Karl
AU - Shah, Manan A.
AU - Wang, Dayong
AU - Rousson, Mikael
AU - Hedlund, Martin
AU - Tellez, David
AU - Ciompi, Francesco
AU - Zerhouni, Erwan
AU - Lanyi, David
AU - Viana, Matheus
AU - Kovalev, Vassili
AU - Liauchuk, Vitali
AU - Phoulady, Hady Ahmady
AU - Qaiser, Talha
AU - Graham, Simon
AU - Rajpoot, Nasir
AU - Sjöblom, Erik
AU - Molin, Jesper
AU - Paeng, Kyunghyun
AU - Hwang, Sangheum
AU - Park, Sunggyun
AU - Jia, Zhipeng
AU - Chang, Eric I.Chao
AU - Xu, Yan
AU - Beck, Andrew H.
AU - van Diest, Paul J.
AU - Pluim, Josien P.W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Tumor proliferation is an important biomarker indicative of the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Assessment of tumor proliferation in a clinical setting is a highly subjective and labor-intensive task. Previous efforts to automate tumor proliferation assessment by image analysis only focused on mitosis detection in predefined tumor regions. However, in a real-world scenario, automatic mitosis detection should be performed in whole-slide images (WSIs) and an automatic method should be able to produce a tumor proliferation score given a WSI as input. To address this, we organized the TUmor Proliferation Assessment Challenge 2016 (TUPAC16) on prediction of tumor proliferation scores from WSIs. The challenge dataset consisted of 500 training and 321 testing breast cancer histopathology WSIs. In order to ensure fair and independent evaluation, only the ground truth for the training dataset was provided to the challenge participants. The first task of the challenge was to predict mitotic scores, i.e., to reproduce the manual method of assessing tumor proliferation by a pathologist. The second task was to predict the gene expression based PAM50 proliferation scores from the WSI. The best performing automatic method for the first task achieved a quadratic-weighted Cohen's kappa score of κ = 0.567, 95% CI [0.464, 0.671] between the predicted scores and the ground truth. For the second task, the predictions of the top method had a Spearman's correlation coefficient of r = 0.617, 95% CI [0.581 0.651] with the ground truth. This was the first comparison study that investigated tumor proliferation assessment from WSIs. The achieved results are promising given the difficulty of the tasks and weakly-labeled nature of the ground truth. However, further research is needed to improve the practical utility of image analysis methods for this task.
AB - Tumor proliferation is an important biomarker indicative of the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Assessment of tumor proliferation in a clinical setting is a highly subjective and labor-intensive task. Previous efforts to automate tumor proliferation assessment by image analysis only focused on mitosis detection in predefined tumor regions. However, in a real-world scenario, automatic mitosis detection should be performed in whole-slide images (WSIs) and an automatic method should be able to produce a tumor proliferation score given a WSI as input. To address this, we organized the TUmor Proliferation Assessment Challenge 2016 (TUPAC16) on prediction of tumor proliferation scores from WSIs. The challenge dataset consisted of 500 training and 321 testing breast cancer histopathology WSIs. In order to ensure fair and independent evaluation, only the ground truth for the training dataset was provided to the challenge participants. The first task of the challenge was to predict mitotic scores, i.e., to reproduce the manual method of assessing tumor proliferation by a pathologist. The second task was to predict the gene expression based PAM50 proliferation scores from the WSI. The best performing automatic method for the first task achieved a quadratic-weighted Cohen's kappa score of κ = 0.567, 95% CI [0.464, 0.671] between the predicted scores and the ground truth. For the second task, the predictions of the top method had a Spearman's correlation coefficient of r = 0.617, 95% CI [0.581 0.651] with the ground truth. This was the first comparison study that investigated tumor proliferation assessment from WSIs. The achieved results are promising given the difficulty of the tasks and weakly-labeled nature of the ground truth. However, further research is needed to improve the practical utility of image analysis methods for this task.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Cancer prognostication
KW - Deep learning
KW - Tumor proliferation
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Gene Expression
KW - Cell Proliferation
KW - Prognosis
KW - Mitosis
KW - Humans
KW - Deep Learning
KW - Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis
KW - Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Female
KW - Breast Neoplasms/genetics
KW - Pathology/methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062515954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.media.2019.02.012
DO - 10.1016/j.media.2019.02.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 30861443
AN - SCOPUS:85062515954
SN - 1361-8415
VL - 54
SP - 111
EP - 121
JO - Medical Image Analysis
JF - Medical Image Analysis
ER -