Prediagnostic Blood Metal Levels and the Risk of Parkinson's Disease: A Large European Prospective Cohort

Yujia Zhao, Anushree Ray, Karin Broberg, Maria Kippler, Christina M. Lill, Paolo Vineis, Verena A. Katzke, Miguel Rodriguez-Barranco, María Dolores Chirlaque, Marcela Guevara, Jesús Humberto Gómez, Johnni Hansen, Salvatore Panico, Lefkos T. Middleton, Giovanna Masala, Valeria Pala, Ana Vinagre-Aragon, Maurizio Zibetti, Roel Vermeulen, Susan Peters*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Metals have been postulated as environmental concerns in the etiology of Parkinson's disease (PD), but metal levels are typically measured after diagnosis, which might be subject to reverse causality. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between prediagnostic blood metal levels and PD risk. Methods: A case-control study was nested in a prospective European cohort, using erythrocyte samples collected before PD diagnosis. Results: Most assessed metals were not associated with PD risk. Cadmium has a suggestive negative association with PD (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for the highest quartile, 0.70 [0.42–1.17]), which diminished among never smokers. Among current smokers only, lead was associated with decreased PD risk (0.06 [0.01–0.35]), whereas arsenic showed associations toward an increased PD risk (1.85 [0.45–7.93]). Conclusions: We observe no strong evidence to support a role of metals in the development of PD. In particular, smoking may confound the association with tobacco-derived metals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2302-2307
Number of pages6
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume38
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • cohort study
  • metals
  • Parkinson's disease
  • prospective exposure assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prediagnostic Blood Metal Levels and the Risk of Parkinson's Disease: A Large European Prospective Cohort'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this