TY - JOUR
T1 - Precautionary allergen labeling
T2 - Current communication problems and potential for future improvements
AU - Linders, Yvette F.M.
AU - Lentz, Leo R.
AU - Blom, W. Marty
AU - Michelsen-Huisman, Anouska
AU - Strikwerda, Jelle
AU - van Dijk, Liselotte M.
AU - Knulst, André C.
AU - Houben, Geert F.
AU - van Os-Medendorp, Harmieke
AU - Holleman, Bregje C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a Future Food grant at Utrecht University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - While there are EU laws for priority allergenic ingredients information on food product packaging, there is no legislation about Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL) for unintended allergen presence (UAP). As a result, PAL is used in different ways by different manufacturers and retailers, which hampers consumers’ interpretation of the information in the PAL. Previous research has focused on the forms of PAL that are used and on the way they are interpreted and used by consumers. This study adds the perspective of producers, retailers and branch organizations. Thirteen interviews with QA- and QC-professionals were conducted to find out more about the reasoning behind their PAL-use and to find out how PAL could be optimized. Results show that harmonization is needed, on different levels: in the way information on UAP is shared between parties involved in the food chain; in the way PAL is presented and phrased; and in the rules and regulations on PAL. More research is needed on possible ways to share (updates on) information on UAP with consumers.
AB - While there are EU laws for priority allergenic ingredients information on food product packaging, there is no legislation about Precautionary Allergen Labelling (PAL) for unintended allergen presence (UAP). As a result, PAL is used in different ways by different manufacturers and retailers, which hampers consumers’ interpretation of the information in the PAL. Previous research has focused on the forms of PAL that are used and on the way they are interpreted and used by consumers. This study adds the perspective of producers, retailers and branch organizations. Thirteen interviews with QA- and QC-professionals were conducted to find out more about the reasoning behind their PAL-use and to find out how PAL could be optimized. Results show that harmonization is needed, on different levels: in the way information on UAP is shared between parties involved in the food chain; in the way PAL is presented and phrased; and in the rules and regulations on PAL. More research is needed on possible ways to share (updates on) information on UAP with consumers.
KW - Allergens
KW - Precautionary allergen labelling (PAL)
KW - Quality control
KW - Supply chain
KW - Unintended allergen presence (UAP)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144370500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109561
DO - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109561
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85144370500
SN - 0956-7135
VL - 147
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Food Control
JF - Food Control
M1 - 109561
ER -