Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review.

Translated title of the contribution: Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Translated title of the contribution	Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review.
Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	746-751
Number of pages	6
Journal	Annals of epidemiology
Volume	18
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.05.007
Publication status	Published - 2008

Access to Document

@article{c745c79aae084d8fb73a96aa9f63210b,

title = "Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review.",

author = "R.H.H. Groenwold and \{van Deursen\}, A.M. and A.W. Hoes and E. Hak",

year = "2008",

doi = "10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.05.007",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "18",

pages = "746--751",

journal = "Annals of epidemiology",

issn = "1047-2797",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review.

AU - Groenwold, R.H.H.

AU - van Deursen, A.M.

AU - Hoes, A.W.

AU - Hak, E.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.05.007

M3 - Article

SN - 1047-2797

VL - 18

SP - 746

EP - 751

JO - Annals of epidemiology

JF - Annals of epidemiology

IS - 10

ER -