Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pitfalls in clinical assessment of neurotoxic diseases: negative effects of repeated diagnostic evaluation, illustrated by a clinical case

  • Moniek van Hout*
  • , Gerard Hageman
  • , Evelien van Valen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Exposure to different toxic substances can have acute and chronic neurological and neuropsychiatric health effects on humans. Patients often report impaired concentration and memory, irritability, fatigue, instability of affect and difficulties in impulse control. The diagnostic process for neurotoxic diseases is complex and relies heavily on the exclusion of differential diagnosis and substantiating the cognitive complaints by neuropsychological assessment. Diagnostic evaluations have the purpose to help the patient by finding an explanation for the symptoms to guide treatment strategy or prevent further deterioration. But what if the diagnostic process in itself leads to problems that can be quite persistent and difficult to manage? The iatrogenic, or sick-making, side effects of the diagnostic process are the main focus of this case study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-52
Number of pages6
JournalNeurotoxicology
Volume45
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Keywords

  • Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological/standards
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Malingering/etiology
  • Middle Aged
  • Neuropsychological Tests/standards
  • Neurotoxicity Syndromes/complications
  • Occupational Diseases/chemically induced
  • Occupational Exposure
  • Somatoform Disorders/etiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pitfalls in clinical assessment of neurotoxic diseases: negative effects of repeated diagnostic evaluation, illustrated by a clinical case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this