Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial

  • M.A. Hegeman*
  • , D.J. Bekedam
  • , K.W.M. Bloemenkamp
  • , A. Kwee
  • , D.N. Papatsonis
  • , J.A.M. van der Post
  • , A.C. Lim
  • , H.C. Scheepers
  • , C. Willekes
  • , J.J. Duvekot
  • , M. Spaanderman
  • , M. Porath
  • , J. van Eyck
  • , M.C. Haak
  • , M.G. Pampus
  • , H.W. Bruinse
  • , B.W.J. Mol
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background
Multiple pregnancies are at high risk for preterm birth, and therefore an important cause of infant mortality and morbidity. A pessary is a simple and potentially effective measure for the prevention of preterm birth. Small studies have indicated its effectiveness, but large studies with sufficient power on the subject are lacking. Despite this lack of evidence, the treatment is at present applied by some gynaecologists in The Netherlands.

Methods/Design
We aim to investigate the hypothesis that prophylactic use of a cervical pessary will be effective in the prevention of preterm delivery and the neonatal mortality and morbidity resulting from preterm delivery in multiple pregnancy. We will evaluate the costs and effects of this intervention. At study entry, cervical length will be measured. Eligible women will be randomly allocated to receive either a cervical pessary or no intervention. The cervical pessary will be placed in situ at 16 to 20 weeks, and will stay in situ up to 36 weeks gestation or until delivery, whatever comes first.

The primary outcome is composite bad neonatal condition (perinatal death or severe morbidity). Secondary outcome measures are time to delivery, preterm birth rate before 32 and 37 weeks, days of admission in neonatal intensive care unit, maternal morbidity, maternal admission days for preterm labour and costs. We need to include 660 women to indicate a reduction in bad neonatal outcome from 7.2% without to 3.9% with a cervical pessary, using a two-sided test with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.80.

Discussion
This trial will provide evidence on whether a cervical pessary will decrease the incidence of early preterm birth and its concomitant bad neonatal outcome in multiple pregnancies.
Original languageEnglish
Article number44
Number of pages1
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth [E]
Volume17
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Correction: Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial

    Liem, S. M. S., Bekedam, D. J., Bloemenkamp, K. W. M., Kwee, A., Papatsonis, D. N. M., van der Post, J. A. M., Lim, A. C., Scheepers, H. C. J., Willekes, C., Duvekot, J. J., Spaanderman, M., Porath, M., van Eyck, J., Haak, M. C., van Pampus, M. G., Bruinse, H. W., Mol, B. W. J. & Hegeman, M. A., 23 May 2012, In: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 12, 37.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademicpeer-review

    Open Access
    File
    1 Citation (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this