TY - JOUR
T1 - Personalised treatment targets in type 2 diabetes patients
T2 - The Dutch approach
AU - Boels, Anne Meike
AU - Hart, Huberta E
AU - Rutten, Guy E
AU - Vos, Rimke C
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Primary Care Diabetes Europe
PY - 2017/2
Y1 - 2017/2
N2 - AIMS: To compare the proportion of cardiometabolic well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients according to a clearly defined, simple personalised approach, versus the 'one-size-fits-all' approach.METHODS: Observational study using routine data of primary care type 2 diabetes patients in the Netherlands. The proportions of patients that reach the targets for HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the two different approaches were compared.RESULTS: Of the 890 patients (54.7% men, mean age 62.7 years), 31.8% were well-controlled according to the individualised approach and 24.8% according to the 'one-size-fits-all' approach. For specific subgroups personalising the treatment led to a 5.2%, 27.3% and 45.6% increase of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HbA1c and systolic blood pressure goals respectively.CONCLUSIONS: A clearly defined and relatively simple personalised approach leads to a higher proportion of T2DM patients considered as cardiometabolic well-controlled. This approach may especially be beneficial for patients aged ≥70 years on more than metformin monotherapy (HbA1c) and for patients aged ≥80 years (SBP). Precisely these patients are suggested not to benefit from stricter HbA1c or SBP targets, whereas they may experience more adverse effects (e.g. hypoglycaemia, postural hypotension) when a stricter target value is pursued.
AB - AIMS: To compare the proportion of cardiometabolic well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients according to a clearly defined, simple personalised approach, versus the 'one-size-fits-all' approach.METHODS: Observational study using routine data of primary care type 2 diabetes patients in the Netherlands. The proportions of patients that reach the targets for HbA1c, systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the two different approaches were compared.RESULTS: Of the 890 patients (54.7% men, mean age 62.7 years), 31.8% were well-controlled according to the individualised approach and 24.8% according to the 'one-size-fits-all' approach. For specific subgroups personalising the treatment led to a 5.2%, 27.3% and 45.6% increase of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HbA1c and systolic blood pressure goals respectively.CONCLUSIONS: A clearly defined and relatively simple personalised approach leads to a higher proportion of T2DM patients considered as cardiometabolic well-controlled. This approach may especially be beneficial for patients aged ≥70 years on more than metformin monotherapy (HbA1c) and for patients aged ≥80 years (SBP). Precisely these patients are suggested not to benefit from stricter HbA1c or SBP targets, whereas they may experience more adverse effects (e.g. hypoglycaemia, postural hypotension) when a stricter target value is pursued.
KW - Individualised medicine
KW - Patient-centred care
KW - Performance measures
KW - Personalised medicine
KW - Practice guidelines
KW - Treatment targets
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994895244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.08.001
DO - 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.08.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 27633894
SN - 1751-9918
VL - 11
SP - 71
EP - 77
JO - Primary Care Diabetes
JF - Primary Care Diabetes
IS - 1
ER -