TY - JOUR
T1 - Percutaneous coronary interventions improve phasic cardiac–coronary interaction in chronic coronary syndromes as assessed by wave intensity analysis
AU - Taş, Ahmet
AU - Alan, Yaren
AU - Ozcan, Alp
AU - Kara Taş, Ilke
AU - Taş, Nehir
AU - Sezer, Irem
AU - Hoef, Tim P.van de
AU - Parker, Kim H.
AU - Sezer, Murat
AU - Piek, Jan J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
PY - 2026/7
Y1 - 2026/7
N2 - Background: Clinical benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) remains controversial. Coronary wave intensity analysis (WIA) provides mechanistic insights into cardiac–coronary coupling. Objectives: To assess peri-PCI WIA changes at rest and during hyperaemia, and to identify features associated with improvements in epicardial and microvascular resistance. Methods: Intracoronary Doppler and pressure measurements were analysed in 27 CCS patients undergoing elective PCI. Haemodynamics (fractional flow reserve (FFR), basal and hyperaemic stenosis resistance (bSR, hSR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), basal and hyperaemic microvascular resistance (bMR, hMR)) and WIA metrics (forward compression wave (FCW), backward compression wave (BCW), forward expansion wave (FEW), backward expansion wave (BEW), wave speed) were quantified at rest and hyperaemia. Results: PCI reduced bSR and hSR (p<0.001), increased FFR (0.58±0.18 to 0.87±0.09; p<0.001) and CFR (1.68±0.47 to 2.79±0.62; p<0.001), and lowered hMR (2.22 (1.67–3.10) to 1.49 (1.18–1.74); p<0.001). At rest, PCI increased FCW (40.3±48.9 to 89.3±64.8; p=0.022), FEW (24.5 (7.2–42.8) to 58.8 (24.0–93.1); p=0.001) and BEW (57.6±70.6 to 82.1±51.8; p=0.017). Hyperaemic backward wave peaks augmented significantly (BCW: 77.8±53.3 to 172.8±112.3; BEW: 60.5±47.5 to 126.7±66.2; both p<0.001). WIA time-to-peaks occurred earlier post-PCI. Reduced resting wave speed (41±21 to 25±10 m/s; p<0.001) correlated with hMR decreases (r=0.77; p<0.001). Increased resting BEW correlated with total vascular resistance reductions (hSR+hMR; r=−0.76; p<0.001). Conclusions: Elective PCI restores phasic cardiac–coronary coupling. Resting BEW and coronary wave speed provide complementary physiological endpoints reflecting microvascular and epicardial recovery, warranting larger prospective evaluation.
AB - Background: Clinical benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) remains controversial. Coronary wave intensity analysis (WIA) provides mechanistic insights into cardiac–coronary coupling. Objectives: To assess peri-PCI WIA changes at rest and during hyperaemia, and to identify features associated with improvements in epicardial and microvascular resistance. Methods: Intracoronary Doppler and pressure measurements were analysed in 27 CCS patients undergoing elective PCI. Haemodynamics (fractional flow reserve (FFR), basal and hyperaemic stenosis resistance (bSR, hSR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), basal and hyperaemic microvascular resistance (bMR, hMR)) and WIA metrics (forward compression wave (FCW), backward compression wave (BCW), forward expansion wave (FEW), backward expansion wave (BEW), wave speed) were quantified at rest and hyperaemia. Results: PCI reduced bSR and hSR (p<0.001), increased FFR (0.58±0.18 to 0.87±0.09; p<0.001) and CFR (1.68±0.47 to 2.79±0.62; p<0.001), and lowered hMR (2.22 (1.67–3.10) to 1.49 (1.18–1.74); p<0.001). At rest, PCI increased FCW (40.3±48.9 to 89.3±64.8; p=0.022), FEW (24.5 (7.2–42.8) to 58.8 (24.0–93.1); p=0.001) and BEW (57.6±70.6 to 82.1±51.8; p=0.017). Hyperaemic backward wave peaks augmented significantly (BCW: 77.8±53.3 to 172.8±112.3; BEW: 60.5±47.5 to 126.7±66.2; both p<0.001). WIA time-to-peaks occurred earlier post-PCI. Reduced resting wave speed (41±21 to 25±10 m/s; p<0.001) correlated with hMR decreases (r=0.77; p<0.001). Increased resting BEW correlated with total vascular resistance reductions (hSR+hMR; r=−0.76; p<0.001). Conclusions: Elective PCI restores phasic cardiac–coronary coupling. Resting BEW and coronary wave speed provide complementary physiological endpoints reflecting microvascular and epicardial recovery, warranting larger prospective evaluation.
KW - Coronary Artery Disease
KW - Coronary Vessels
KW - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105045528597
U2 - 10.1136/openhrt-2026-004194
DO - 10.1136/openhrt-2026-004194
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105045528597
SN - 2398-595X
VL - 13
JO - Open Heart
JF - Open Heart
IS - 2
M1 - e004194
ER -