Patients With Barrett's Esophagus and Confirmed Persistent Low-Grade Dysplasia Are at Increased Risk for Progression to Neoplasia

Lucas C. Duits, Myrtle J. van der Wel, Cary C. Cotton, K. Nadine Phoa, Fiebo J W ten Kate, Cees A. Seldenrijk, G. Johan A Offerhaus, Mike Visser, Sybren L. Meijer, Rosalie C. Mallant-Hent, Kausilia K. Krishnadath, Roos E. Pouw, Jan G P Tijssen, Nicholas J. Shaheen, Jacques J G H M Bergman*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


Background & Aims For patients with Barrett's esophagus, the diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is subjective, and reported outcomes vary. We analyzed data from a multicenter study of endoscopic therapy to identify factors associated with progression to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in patients with LGD of the esophagus. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 255 patients with a primary diagnosis of LGD (78% men; mean age, 63 years) who participated in a randomized controlled trial of surveillance vs radiofrequency ablation in Europe. Three expert pathologists independently reviewed baseline and subsequent LGD specimens. The presence and degree of dysplasia was separately recorded for each biopsy and classified according to the Vienna Classification system. The primary end point was development of HGD or EAC. We performed univariate logistic regression analyses to assess the association between outcomes and factors such as number of pathologists confirming LGD, multifocality of LGD, and persistence of LGD over time. Results Of the 255 patients, 45 (18%) developed HGD or EAC during a median 42-month follow-up period (interquartile range, 25–61 months); patients were examined by a median 4 endoscopies (interquartile range, 3–6 endoscopies). The number of pathologists confirming LGD was strongly associated with progression to neoplasia; risk for progression increased greatly when all 3 pathologists agreed on LGD (odds ratio, 47.14; 95% confidence interval, 13.10–169.70). When LGD was detected at baseline and confirmed by a subsequent endoscopy, the odds for progression to neoplasia also increased greatly (odds ratio, 9.28; 95% confidence interval, 4.39–19.64). Multifocal LGD was not significantly associated with progression to neoplasia. Conclusions The number of pathologists confirming LGD and persistence of LGD over time increase risk for development of HGD or EAC in patients with Barrett's esophagus and LGD. These simple, readily available variables can help stratify risk and select patients for prophylactic ablation therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)993-1001.e1
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017


  • Esophageal Cancer
  • Histopathology
  • Prognostic Factor
  • SURF Trial


Dive into the research topics of 'Patients With Barrett's Esophagus and Confirmed Persistent Low-Grade Dysplasia Are at Increased Risk for Progression to Neoplasia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this