Abstract
Background: Perspectives of patients, parents and professional experts on personalized regenerative implants for regenerative medicine purposes are largely unknown. Method: To better understand these perspectives, we conducted four focus groups with professional experts of mixed European nationality (n = 8), Dutch patients with regular implants (n = 8), Dutch and Belgian (n = 5) and Spanish (n = 8) parents of children with cleft palate. Results: Two overarching themes were identified: ‘patient-centered research and care’ and ‘ambivalent attitudes toward personalized regenerative implants’. Discussion: The results reveal that stakeholders should adopt a participatory rather than an impairment discourse and address the ambivalence among professional experts, patients and parents. Conclusion: Considering stakeholder perspectives facilitates ethical and responsible development and use of personalized regenerative implants.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e2386214 |
| Pages (from-to) | 393-406 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Regenerative Medicine |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 7-8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- ethics
- implant
- perspectives
- qualitative research
- regenerative medicine
- stakeholder participation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Patient, parent and professional expert perspectives on personalized regenerative implants: a qualitative focus group study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver