TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient and family caregiver perspectives of Advance Care Planning
T2 - qualitative findings from the ACTION cluster randomised controlled trial of an adapted respecting choices intervention
AU - Pollock, K.
AU - Bulli, F.
AU - Caswell, G.
AU - Kodba-Čeh, H.
AU - Lunder, U.
AU - Miccinesi, G.
AU - Seymour, J.
AU - Toccafondi, A.
AU - van Delden, J. J.M.
AU - Zwakman, M.
AU - Rietjens, J.
AU - van der Heide, A.
AU - Kars, M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Advance Care Planning (ACP) is widely regarded as a component of good end-of-life care. However, findings from a qualitative international study of patient and family caregiver attitudes and preferences regarding ACP highlight participants’ ambivalence towards confronting the future and the factors underlying their motivation to accept or defer anticipatory planning. They show how ACP impacts on, and can be determined by, relationships between patients and their family caregivers. Although some patients may welcome the chance to engage in ACP a tendency towards either therapeutic optimism or fatalism can limit its perceived appeal or benefit. The focus on individual autonomy as an ethical principle underlying ACP does not resonate with real world settings. Many patients naturally orient to share responsibility and decision making within the network of significant others in which they are embedded, rather than exert unfettered freedom of ‘choice’.
AB - Advance Care Planning (ACP) is widely regarded as a component of good end-of-life care. However, findings from a qualitative international study of patient and family caregiver attitudes and preferences regarding ACP highlight participants’ ambivalence towards confronting the future and the factors underlying their motivation to accept or defer anticipatory planning. They show how ACP impacts on, and can be determined by, relationships between patients and their family caregivers. Although some patients may welcome the chance to engage in ACP a tendency towards either therapeutic optimism or fatalism can limit its perceived appeal or benefit. The focus on individual autonomy as an ethical principle underlying ACP does not resonate with real world settings. Many patients naturally orient to share responsibility and decision making within the network of significant others in which they are embedded, rather than exert unfettered freedom of ‘choice’.
KW - Advance Care Planning
KW - cancer
KW - end of life care
KW - qualitative research
KW - Respecting choices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136485077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13576275.2022.2107424
DO - 10.1080/13576275.2022.2107424
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85136485077
SN - 1357-6275
VL - 29
SP - 69
EP - 89
JO - Mortality
JF - Mortality
IS - 1
M1 - doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2022.2107424
ER -