Participatory methods in pediatric participatory research: a systematic review

Hanneke A Haijes, Ghislaine J M W van Thiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Meaningful child participation in medical research is seen as important. In order to facilitate further development of participatory research, we performed a systematic literature study to describe and assess the available knowledge on participatory methods in pediatric research. A search was executed in five databases: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane. After careful screening of relevant papers, finally 24 documents were included in our analysis. Literature on participatory methods in pediatric research appears generally to be descriptive, whereby high quality evidence is lacking. Overall, five groups of participatory methods for children could be distinguished: observational, verbal, written, visual and active methods. The choice for one of these methods should be based on the child's age, on social and demographic characteristics and on the research objectives. To date, these methods are still solely used for obtaining data, yet they are suitable for conducting meaningful participation. This may result in a successful partnership between children and researchers. Researchers conducting participatory research with children can use this systematic review in order to weigh the current knowledge about the participatory methods presented.Pediatric Research (2015); doi:10.1038/pr.2015.279.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)676-683
JournalPediatric Research
Volume79
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Participatory methods in pediatric participatory research: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this