Pain Experience and Image Quality with Curved versus Standard Compression for Breast Cancer Screening Mammography: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Daniëlle van der Waal*, Cary van Landsveld-Verhoeven, Eric Tetteroo, Ruben E. van Engen, Ioannis Sechopoulos, Ruud M. Pijnappel, Mireille J.M. Broeders

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background A curve-shaped compression paddle could reduce the pain experienced by some women at breast cancer screening. Purpose To compare curved and standard compression systems in terms of pain experience and image quality in mammography screening. Materials and Methods In this randomized controlled trial conducted between October 2021 and February 2022, participants screened at three screening sites in the Netherlands were randomized to either a curved-paddle or sham-paddle group. The sham paddle was a standard paddle that was presented as a new paddle. At a standard screening examination, one additional image was acquired with a curved or sham paddle. Pain was measured on a numerical rating scale (range, 0-10). Participants provided a pain score after compression with the standard and test paddles, resulting in two scores per participant. Differences in pain scores were compared between groups using analysis of covariance, adjusting for pain score after standard-paddle compression. Two radiographers and two radiologists performed unblinded paired comparisons of curved-paddle vs standard-paddle images, using standard image quality criteria (radiographers evaluated 1246 image pairs using 12 criteria; radiologists evaluated 320 image pairs using six criteria). The one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine if there was a significant preference for either paddle. Results In total, 2499 female participants (mean age, 61.6 years ± 7.1 [SD]) were studied; 1250 in the curved-paddle group and 1249 in the sham-paddle group. The mean pain score decreased by an additional 0.19 points in the curved-paddle group compared with the sham-paddle group (95% CI: 0.09, 0.28; P < .001). In terms of image quality, the observers showed no preference or a preference for the standard paddle. Decreased image contrast (range Bonferroni-corrected P values: P < .001 to P > .99) and visibility of structures were the main concerns for curved-paddle images. Conclusion The use of the curved paddle resulted in a minimal pain reduction during mammography breast compression but image quality was reduced.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere232680
Number of pages10
JournalRadiology
Volume312
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pain Experience and Image Quality with Curved versus Standard Compression for Breast Cancer Screening Mammography: A Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this