Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outpatient and Ambulatory Extended Recovery Robotic Hepatectomy: Multinational Study of 307 Cases

  • James O. Park
  • , Kelly Lafaro
  • , Jeroen Hagendoorn
  • , Laleh Melstrom
  • , Michael F. Gerhards
  • , Burak Görgec
  • , Hendrik A. Marsman
  • , Lucas W. Thornblade
  • , Gabriela Pilz da Cunha
  • , Frank F. Yang
  • , Kevin P. Labadie
  • , Jonathan G. Sham
  • , Rutger Jan Swijnenburg
  • , Jin He
  • , Yuman Fong*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For open minor hepatectomy, morbidity and recovery are dominated by the incision. The robotic approach may transform this "incision dominant procedure" into a safe outpatient procedure. STUDY DESIGN: We audited outpatient (less than 2 midnights) robotic hepatectomy at 6 hepatobiliary centers in 2 nations to test the hypothesis that the robotic approach can be a safe and effective short-stay procedure. Establishing early recovery after surgery programs were active at all sites, and home digital monitoring was available at 1 of the institutions. RESULTS: A total of 307 outpatient (26 same-day and 281 next-day discharge) robotic hepatectomies were identified (2013 to 2023). Most were minor hepatectomies (194 single segments, 90 bi-segmentectomies, 14 three segments, and 8 four segments). Thirty-nine (13%) were for benign histology, whereas 268 were for cancer (33 hepatocellular carcinoma, 27 biliary, and 208 metastatic disease). Patient characteristics were a median age of 60 years (18 to 93 years), 55% male, and a median BMI of 26 kg/m 2 (14 to 63 kg/m 2 ). Thirty (10%) patients had cirrhosis. One hundred eighty-seven (61%) had previous abdominal operation. Median operative time was 163 minutes (30 to 433 minutes), with a median blood loss of 50 mL (10 to 900 mL). There were no deaths and 6 complications (2%): 2 wound infections, 1 failure to thrive, and 3 perihepatic abscesses. Readmission was required in 5 (1.6%) patients. Of the 268 malignancy cases, 25 (9%) were R1 resections. Of the 128 with superior segment resections (segments 7, 8, 4A, 2, and 1), there were 12 positive margins (9%) and 2 readmissions for abscess. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient robotic hepatectomy in well-selected cases is safe (0 mortality, 2% complication, and 1.6% readmission), including resection in the superior or posterior portions of the liver that is challenging with nonarticulating laparoscopic instruments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-67
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume239
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Hepatectomy/methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
  • Male
  • Female
  • Aged
  • Adult
  • Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Adolescent
  • Young Adult
  • Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
  • Liver Neoplasms/surgery
  • Retrospective Studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outpatient and Ambulatory Extended Recovery Robotic Hepatectomy: Multinational Study of 307 Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this