TY - JOUR
T1 - Osteoinductive calcium phosphate with submicron topography as bone graft substitute for maxillary sinus floor augmentation
T2 - A translational study
AU - van Dijk, Lukas A.
AU - Janssen, Nard G.
AU - Nurmohamed, Silke J.
AU - Muradin, Marvick S.M.
AU - Longoni, Alessia
AU - Bakker, Robbert C.
AU - de Groot, Florence G.
AU - de Bruijn, Joost D.
AU - Gawlitta, Debby
AU - Rosenberg, Antoine J.W.P.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 674282, no. 874790 and no. 953169) and Kuros Biosciences BV.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was the preclinical and clinical evaluation of osteoinductive calcium phosphate with submicron surface topography as a bone graft substitute for maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA). Material and Methods: A preclinical sheep model of MSFA was used to compare a calcium phosphate with submicron needle-shaped topography (BCPN, MagnetOs Granules, Kuros Biosciences BV) to a calcium phosphate with submicron grain-shaped topography (BCPG) and autologous bone graft (ABG) as controls. Secondly, a 10-patient, prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare BCPN to ABG in MSFA with two-stage implant placement. Results: The pre-clinical study demonstrated that both BCPN and BCPG were highly biocompatible, supported bony ingrowth with direct bone apposition against the material, and exhibited bone formation as early as 3 weeks post-implantation. However, BCPN demonstrated significantly more bone formation than BCPG at the study endpoint of 12 weeks. Only BCPN reached an equivalent amount of bone formation in the available space and a greater proportion of calcified material (bone + graft material) in the maxillary sinus compared to the “gold standard” ABG after 12 weeks. These results were validated in a small prospective clinical study, in which BCPN was found comparable to ABG in implant stability, bone height, new bone formation in trephine core biopsies, and overall clinical outcome. Conclusion: This translational work demonstrates that osteoinductive calcium phosphates are promising bone graft substitutes for MSFA, whereas their bone-forming potential depends on the design of their surface features. Netherlands Trial Register, NL6436.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was the preclinical and clinical evaluation of osteoinductive calcium phosphate with submicron surface topography as a bone graft substitute for maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA). Material and Methods: A preclinical sheep model of MSFA was used to compare a calcium phosphate with submicron needle-shaped topography (BCPN, MagnetOs Granules, Kuros Biosciences BV) to a calcium phosphate with submicron grain-shaped topography (BCPG) and autologous bone graft (ABG) as controls. Secondly, a 10-patient, prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare BCPN to ABG in MSFA with two-stage implant placement. Results: The pre-clinical study demonstrated that both BCPN and BCPG were highly biocompatible, supported bony ingrowth with direct bone apposition against the material, and exhibited bone formation as early as 3 weeks post-implantation. However, BCPN demonstrated significantly more bone formation than BCPG at the study endpoint of 12 weeks. Only BCPN reached an equivalent amount of bone formation in the available space and a greater proportion of calcified material (bone + graft material) in the maxillary sinus compared to the “gold standard” ABG after 12 weeks. These results were validated in a small prospective clinical study, in which BCPN was found comparable to ABG in implant stability, bone height, new bone formation in trephine core biopsies, and overall clinical outcome. Conclusion: This translational work demonstrates that osteoinductive calcium phosphates are promising bone graft substitutes for MSFA, whereas their bone-forming potential depends on the design of their surface features. Netherlands Trial Register, NL6436.
KW - bone graft substitutes
KW - clinical study
KW - osteoinductive calcium phosphate
KW - preprosthetic dental surgery
KW - sinus floor augmentation
KW - submicron surface topography
KW - translational research bone regeneration
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147371433
U2 - 10.1111/clr.14028
DO - 10.1111/clr.14028
M3 - Article
C2 - 36645164
AN - SCOPUS:85147371433
SN - 0905-7161
VL - 34
SP - 177
EP - 195
JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research
JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research
IS - 3
ER -