TY - JOUR
T1 - Osteoarthritis endotype discovery via clustering of biochemical marker data
AU - Angelini, Federico
AU - Widera, Paweł
AU - Mobasheri, Ali
AU - Blair, Joseph
AU - Struglics, André
AU - Uebelhoer, Melanie
AU - Henrotin, Yves
AU - Marijnissen, Anne C.A.
AU - Kloppenburg, Margreet
AU - Blanco, Francisco J.
AU - Haugen, Ida K.
AU - Berenbaum, Francis
AU - Ladel, Christoph
AU - Larkin, Jonathan
AU - Bay-Jensen, Anne C.
AU - Bacardit, Jaume
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding The research leading to these results has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under Grant Agreement no 115770, resources of which are composed of financial contributions from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) and EFPIA companies’ in-kind contribution. See http://www.imi.europa.eu/ and http:// wwwapproachprojecteu/.
Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Objectives Osteoarthritis (OA) patient stratification is an important challenge to design tailored treatments and drive drug development. Biochemical markers reflecting joint tissue turnover were measured in the IMI-APPROACH cohort at baseline and analysed using a machine learning approach in order to study OA-dominant phenotypes driven by the endotype-related clusters and discover the driving features and their disease-context meaning. Method Data quality assessment was performed to design appropriate data preprocessing techniques. The k-means clustering algorithm was used to find dominant subgroups of patients based on the biochemical markers data. Classification models were trained to predict cluster membership, and Explainable AI techniques were used to interpret these to reveal the driving factors behind each cluster and identify phenotypes. Statistical analysis was performed to compare differences between clusters with respect to other markers in the IMI-APPROACH cohort and the longitudinal disease progression. Results Three dominant endotypes were found, associated with three phenotypes: C1) low tissue turnover (low repair and articular cartilage/subchondral bone turnover), C2) structural damage (high bone formation/resorption, cartilage degradation) and C3) systemic inflammation (joint tissue degradation, inflammation, cartilage degradation). The method achieved consistent results in the FNIH/OAI cohort. C1 had the highest proportion of non-progressors. C2 was mostly linked to longitudinal structural progression, and C3 was linked to sustained or progressive pain. Conclusions This work supports the existence of differential phenotypes in OA. The biomarker approach could potentially drive stratification for OA clinical trials and contribute to precision medicine strategies for OA progression in the future. Trial registration number NCT03883568.
AB - Objectives Osteoarthritis (OA) patient stratification is an important challenge to design tailored treatments and drive drug development. Biochemical markers reflecting joint tissue turnover were measured in the IMI-APPROACH cohort at baseline and analysed using a machine learning approach in order to study OA-dominant phenotypes driven by the endotype-related clusters and discover the driving features and their disease-context meaning. Method Data quality assessment was performed to design appropriate data preprocessing techniques. The k-means clustering algorithm was used to find dominant subgroups of patients based on the biochemical markers data. Classification models were trained to predict cluster membership, and Explainable AI techniques were used to interpret these to reveal the driving factors behind each cluster and identify phenotypes. Statistical analysis was performed to compare differences between clusters with respect to other markers in the IMI-APPROACH cohort and the longitudinal disease progression. Results Three dominant endotypes were found, associated with three phenotypes: C1) low tissue turnover (low repair and articular cartilage/subchondral bone turnover), C2) structural damage (high bone formation/resorption, cartilage degradation) and C3) systemic inflammation (joint tissue degradation, inflammation, cartilage degradation). The method achieved consistent results in the FNIH/OAI cohort. C1 had the highest proportion of non-progressors. C2 was mostly linked to longitudinal structural progression, and C3 was linked to sustained or progressive pain. Conclusions This work supports the existence of differential phenotypes in OA. The biomarker approach could potentially drive stratification for OA clinical trials and contribute to precision medicine strategies for OA progression in the future. Trial registration number NCT03883568.
KW - epidemiology
KW - knee
KW - osteoarthritis
KW - Bone Resorption
KW - Humans
KW - Cartilage, Articular
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Inflammation
KW - Disease Progression
KW - Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy
KW - Cluster Analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128431123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221763
DO - 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221763
M3 - Article
C2 - 35246457
AN - SCOPUS:85128431123
SN - 0003-4967
VL - 81
SP - 666
EP - 675
JO - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
JF - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
IS - 5
ER -