TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing cytological specimens of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions
T2 - A pilot study to the effect of a smear preparation training for endoscopy personnel on sample quality and accuracy
AU - van Riet, Priscilla A.
AU - Quispel, Rutger
AU - Cahen, Djuna L.
AU - Erler, Nicole S.
AU - Snijders-Kruisbergen, Mieke C.
AU - Van Loenen, Petri
AU - Poley, Jan Werner
AU - van Driel, Lydi M.J.W.
AU - Mulder, Sanna A.
AU - Veldt, Bart J.
AU - Leeuwenburgh, Ivonne
AU - Anten, Marie Paule G.F.
AU - Honkoop, Pieter
AU - Thijssen, Annemieke Y.
AU - Hol, Lieke
AU - Hadithi, Mohammed
AU - Fitzpatrick, Claire E.
AU - Schot, Ingrid
AU - Bergmann, Jilling F.
AU - Bhalla, Abha
AU - Bruno, Marco J.
AU - Biermann, Katharina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Diagnostic Cytopathology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background: In the absence of rapid on-side pathological evaluation, endoscopy staff generally “smears” endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens on a glass slide. As this technique is vulnerable to preparation artifacts, we assessed if its quality could be improved through a smear-preparation-training for endoscopy staff. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, 10 endosonographers and 12 endoscopy nurses from seven regional EUS-centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training. Subsequently, post training slides derived from solid pancreatic lesions were compared to pre-training “control” slides. Primary outcome was to assess if the training positively affects smear quality and, consequently, diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions. Results: Participants collected and prepared 71 cases, mostly pancreatic head lesions (48%). Sixty-eight controls were selected from the pretraining period. The presence of artifacts was comparable for smears performed before and after training (76% vs 82%, P =.36). Likewise, smear cellularity (≥50% target cells) before and after training did not differ (44% (30/68) vs 49% (35/71), P =.48). Similar, no difference in diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was detected (P =.10). Conclusion: In this pilot EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training for endoscopy personnel, smear quality and diagnostic accuracy were not improved after the training. Based on these results, we plan to further study other training programs and possibilities.
AB - Background: In the absence of rapid on-side pathological evaluation, endoscopy staff generally “smears” endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens on a glass slide. As this technique is vulnerable to preparation artifacts, we assessed if its quality could be improved through a smear-preparation-training for endoscopy staff. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, 10 endosonographers and 12 endoscopy nurses from seven regional EUS-centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training. Subsequently, post training slides derived from solid pancreatic lesions were compared to pre-training “control” slides. Primary outcome was to assess if the training positively affects smear quality and, consequently, diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions. Results: Participants collected and prepared 71 cases, mostly pancreatic head lesions (48%). Sixty-eight controls were selected from the pretraining period. The presence of artifacts was comparable for smears performed before and after training (76% vs 82%, P =.36). Likewise, smear cellularity (≥50% target cells) before and after training did not differ (44% (30/68) vs 49% (35/71), P =.48). Similar, no difference in diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was detected (P =.10). Conclusion: In this pilot EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training for endoscopy personnel, smear quality and diagnostic accuracy were not improved after the training. Based on these results, we plan to further study other training programs and possibilities.
KW - cytopathology
KW - EUS-guided tissue sampling
KW - smear
KW - training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093520106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/dc.24645
DO - 10.1002/dc.24645
M3 - Article
C2 - 33098625
AN - SCOPUS:85093520106
SN - 8755-1039
VL - 49
SP - 295
EP - 302
JO - Diagnostic cytopathology
JF - Diagnostic cytopathology
IS - 2
ER -