Optimizing cytological specimens of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot study to the effect of a smear preparation training for endoscopy personnel on sample quality and accuracy

Priscilla A. van Riet*, Rutger Quispel, Djuna L. Cahen, Nicole S. Erler, Mieke C. Snijders-Kruisbergen, Petri Van Loenen, Jan Werner Poley, Lydi M.J.W. van Driel, Sanna A. Mulder, Bart J. Veldt, Ivonne Leeuwenburgh, Marie Paule G.F. Anten, Pieter Honkoop, Annemieke Y. Thijssen, Lieke Hol, Mohammed Hadithi, Claire E. Fitzpatrick, Ingrid Schot, Jilling F. Bergmann, Abha BhallaMarco J. Bruno, Katharina Biermann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: In the absence of rapid on-side pathological evaluation, endoscopy staff generally “smears” endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) specimens on a glass slide. As this technique is vulnerable to preparation artifacts, we assessed if its quality could be improved through a smear-preparation-training for endoscopy staff. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, 10 endosonographers and 12 endoscopy nurses from seven regional EUS-centers in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training. Subsequently, post training slides derived from solid pancreatic lesions were compared to pre-training “control” slides. Primary outcome was to assess if the training positively affects smear quality and, consequently, diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions. Results: Participants collected and prepared 71 cases, mostly pancreatic head lesions (48%). Sixty-eight controls were selected from the pretraining period. The presence of artifacts was comparable for smears performed before and after training (76% vs 82%, P =.36). Likewise, smear cellularity (≥50% target cells) before and after training did not differ (44% (30/68) vs 49% (35/71), P =.48). Similar, no difference in diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was detected (P =.10). Conclusion: In this pilot EUS-FNA smear-preparation-training for endoscopy personnel, smear quality and diagnostic accuracy were not improved after the training. Based on these results, we plan to further study other training programs and possibilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-302
Number of pages8
JournalDiagnostic cytopathology
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cytopathology
  • EUS-guided tissue sampling
  • smear
  • training

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing cytological specimens of EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot study to the effect of a smear preparation training for endoscopy personnel on sample quality and accuracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this