TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal timing of simethicone administration prior to upper endoscopy
T2 - A multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial
AU - Beaufort, I N
AU - Verbeek, R E
AU - Bosman, J H
AU - Al-Toma, A
AU - Bogte, A
AU - Alvarez Herrero, L
AU - Weusten, B L A M
N1 - The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 -
Background and study aims Simethicone is useful as premedication for upper endoscopy because of its antifoaming effects. We aimed to evaluate the effect of timing of simethicone administration on mucosal visibility.
Patients and methods In this multicenter, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study, patients scheduled for upper endoscopy were randomized to receive 40 mg simethicone at the following time points prior to the procedure: 20 to 30 minutes (early group), 0 to 10 minutes (late group) or 20 mg simethicone at both time points (split-dose group). Images were taken from nine predefined locations in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum before endoscopic flushing. Each image was scored on mucosal visibility by three independent endoscopists on a 4-point scale (lower scores indicating better visibility), with adequate mucosal visibility defined as a score ≤ 2. Primary outcome was the percentage of patients with adequate total mucosal visibility (TMV), reached if all median subscores for each location were ≤ 2.
Results A total of 386 patients were included (early group: 132; late group: 128; split-dose group: 126). Percentages of adequate TMV were 55%, 42%, and 61% in the early, late, and split-dose group, respectively (
P < 0.01). Adequate TMV was significantly higher in the split-dose group compared to the late group (
P < 0.01), but not compared to the early group (
P = 0.29). Differences between groups were largest in the stomach, where percentages of adequate mucosal visibility were higher in the early (68% vs 53%,
P = 0.03) and split-dose group (69% vs 53%,
P = 0.02) compared to the late group.
Conclusions Mucosal visibility can be optimized with early simethicone administration, either as a single administration or in a split-dose regimen.
AB -
Background and study aims Simethicone is useful as premedication for upper endoscopy because of its antifoaming effects. We aimed to evaluate the effect of timing of simethicone administration on mucosal visibility.
Patients and methods In this multicenter, randomized, endoscopist-blinded study, patients scheduled for upper endoscopy were randomized to receive 40 mg simethicone at the following time points prior to the procedure: 20 to 30 minutes (early group), 0 to 10 minutes (late group) or 20 mg simethicone at both time points (split-dose group). Images were taken from nine predefined locations in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum before endoscopic flushing. Each image was scored on mucosal visibility by three independent endoscopists on a 4-point scale (lower scores indicating better visibility), with adequate mucosal visibility defined as a score ≤ 2. Primary outcome was the percentage of patients with adequate total mucosal visibility (TMV), reached if all median subscores for each location were ≤ 2.
Results A total of 386 patients were included (early group: 132; late group: 128; split-dose group: 126). Percentages of adequate TMV were 55%, 42%, and 61% in the early, late, and split-dose group, respectively (
P < 0.01). Adequate TMV was significantly higher in the split-dose group compared to the late group (
P < 0.01), but not compared to the early group (
P = 0.29). Differences between groups were largest in the stomach, where percentages of adequate mucosal visibility were higher in the early (68% vs 53%,
P = 0.03) and split-dose group (69% vs 53%,
P = 0.02) compared to the late group.
Conclusions Mucosal visibility can be optimized with early simethicone administration, either as a single administration or in a split-dose regimen.
KW - Precancerous conditions & cancerous lesions (displasia and cancer) stomach
KW - Barrett's and adenocarcinoma
KW - Preparation
KW - quality and logistical aspects
KW - Quality management
KW - Diagnosis and imaging (inc chromoendoscopy, NBI, iSCAN, FICE, CLE)
U2 - 10.1055/a-2157-5034
DO - 10.1055/a-2157-5034
M3 - Article
C2 - 37854124
SN - 2364-3722
VL - 11
SP - E992-E1000
JO - Endoscopy international open
JF - Endoscopy international open
IS - 10
ER -