TY - JOUR
T1 - Oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - a systematic review of current definitions and meta-analysis of local therapy outcomes
AU - Nomura, Motoo
AU - Bronzwaer, Sebastiaan F C
AU - Kroese, Tiuri E
AU - van Rossum, Peter S N
AU - Ruurda, Jelle P
AU - van Hillegersberg, Richard
AU - Kato, Ken
AU - Ogata, Takashi
AU - Kanda, Mitsuro
AU - Hamai, Yoichi
AU - Tsubosa, Yasuhiro
AU - Yoshii, Takako
AU - Furuta, Mitsuhiro
AU - Sakanaka, Katsuyuki
AU - Matsuda, Satoru
AU - Tsushima, Takahiro
AU - Laarhoven, Hanneke W M
AU - Takeuchi, Hiroya
N1 - © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact [email protected].
PY - 2026/8
Y1 - 2026/8
N2 - Current European expert consensus definitions for esophagogastric oligometastatic disease (OMD) primarily relate to adenocarcinoma. Oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OMESQ) may require a distinct definition and treatment strategy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify applied OMESQ definitions and assess the impact of local treatment on overall survival (OS). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted (February 2026). Studies or protocols were eligible if they reported an OMESQ definition or outcomes of local treatment in patients with limited metastatic ESCC. The primary outcomes were the maximum number of involved organs and metastases defined as OMD. Agreement across studies was scored as absent/poor (< 50%), fair (50%-75%), or strong (≥ 75%). A meta-analysis of OS after local treatment (+/- systemic therapy) versus systemic therapy alone was conducted through a random-effects pooled analysis of hazard ratios (HRs). Of the 3844 screened articles, 27 studies (23 retrospective, 4 prospective [one randomized]) and 7 protocols were included. Agreement was observed for defining synchronous OMESQ as disease in one organ with ≤3 metastases and metachronous OMESQ as disease in one organ with ≤2 metastases. Across 10 studies, meta-analysis showed that local treatment (+/- systemic therapy) was associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone (pooled HR 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.72; I2 = 50.7%). Current literature and trial protocols considers OMESQ as ≤3 synchronous or ≤ 2 metachronous metastases in 1 organ. Local treatment is associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone.
AB - Current European expert consensus definitions for esophagogastric oligometastatic disease (OMD) primarily relate to adenocarcinoma. Oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OMESQ) may require a distinct definition and treatment strategy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify applied OMESQ definitions and assess the impact of local treatment on overall survival (OS). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted (February 2026). Studies or protocols were eligible if they reported an OMESQ definition or outcomes of local treatment in patients with limited metastatic ESCC. The primary outcomes were the maximum number of involved organs and metastases defined as OMD. Agreement across studies was scored as absent/poor (< 50%), fair (50%-75%), or strong (≥ 75%). A meta-analysis of OS after local treatment (+/- systemic therapy) versus systemic therapy alone was conducted through a random-effects pooled analysis of hazard ratios (HRs). Of the 3844 screened articles, 27 studies (23 retrospective, 4 prospective [one randomized]) and 7 protocols were included. Agreement was observed for defining synchronous OMESQ as disease in one organ with ≤3 metastases and metachronous OMESQ as disease in one organ with ≤2 metastases. Across 10 studies, meta-analysis showed that local treatment (+/- systemic therapy) was associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone (pooled HR 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.72; I2 = 50.7%). Current literature and trial protocols considers OMESQ as ≤3 synchronous or ≤ 2 metachronous metastases in 1 organ. Local treatment is associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone.
KW - Humans
KW - Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy
KW - Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Neoplasm Metastasis
KW - Female
KW - Male
U2 - 10.1093/dote/doag078
DO - 10.1093/dote/doag078
M3 - Article
C2 - 42544486
SN - 1120-8694
VL - 39
JO - Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
JF - Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus
IS - 4
M1 - doag078
ER -