Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Obinutuzumab Pretreatment as a Novel Approach to Mitigate Formation of Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Cergutuzumab Amunaleukin in Patients with Solid Tumors

  • Solange Peters*
  • , Eric Angevin
  • , Teresa Alonso-Gordoa
  • , Kristoffer Rohrberg
  • , Ignacio Melero
  • , Begoña Mellado
  • , Jose-Luis Perez-Gracia
  • , Josep Tabernero
  • , Celine Adessi
  • , Christophe Boetsch
  • , Carl Watson
  • , Joseph Dal Porto
  • , David Dejardin
  • , Christopher Del Nagro
  • , Valeria Nicolini
  • , Stefan Evers
  • , Christian Klein
  • , Barbara Leutgeb
  • , Pavel Pisa
  • , Eva Rossmann
  • José Saro, Pablo Umana, Jehad Charo, Volker Teichgräber, Neeltje Steeghs
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The immunocytokine cergutuzumab amunaleukin (CEA-IL2v) showed manageable safety and favorable pharmacodynamics in phase I/Ib trials in patients with advanced/metastatic carcinoembryonic antigen-positive (CEAþ) solid tumors, but this was accompanied by a high incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). We examined B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab as a potential mitigation strategy. Experimental Design: Preclinical data comparing B-cell depletion with rituximab versus obinutuzumab are summarized. Substudies of phase I/Ib trials investigated the effect of obinutuzumab pretreatment on ADA development, safety, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of CEA-IL2v atezolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic or unresectable CEAþ solid tumors who had progressed on standard of care. Results: Preclinical data showed superior B-cell depletion with obinutuzumab versus rituximab. In clinical studies, patients received CEA-IL2v monotherapy with (n ¼ 16) or without (n ¼ 6) obinutuzumab pretreatment (monotherapy study), or CEA-IL2v þ atezolizumab þ obinutuzumab pretreatment (n ¼ 5; combination study). In the monotherapy study, after four cycles (every 2 weeks treatment), 0/15 evaluable patients administered obinutuzumab pretreatment had ADAs versus 4/6 patients without obinutuzumab. Obinutuzumab pretreatment with CEA-IL2v monotherapy showed no new safety signals and pharmacodynamic data suggested minimal impact on T cells and natural killer cells. Conversely, increased liver toxicity was observed in the combination study (CEA-IL2v þ atezolizumab þ obinutuzumab pretreatment). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that obinutuzumab pretreatment before CEA-IL2v administration in patients with CEAþ solid tumors may be a feasible and potent ADA mitigation strategy, with an acceptable safety profile, supporting broader investigation of obinutuzumab pretreatment for ADA mitigation in other settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1630-1641
Number of pages12
JournalClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
Volume30
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Rituximab

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Obinutuzumab Pretreatment as a Novel Approach to Mitigate Formation of Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Cergutuzumab Amunaleukin in Patients with Solid Tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this