Nitrofurantoin failure in elderly men: A retrospective observational study

Ilse Wolterink*, Theo Verheij, Tamara Platteel, Ann Bruel Van Den, Arjen Stam, Alma Pol Van De

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Urinary tract infections in the elderly are common. Treatment with nitrofurantoin in men may not be sufficient if concomitant tissue involvement is present, resulting in treatment failure. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of nitrofurantoin failure in the elderly, and to assess the effect of gender and age. A retrospective observational study was conducted using a Dutch general practice medical record database of 21,789 men and 26,622 women aged 65 years or older in 2015. First, nitrofurantoin prescriptions in 2015 were analyzed. Nitrofurantoin failure (subsequent prescription of antibiotic within 30 days) for men, women, and different age categories were compared. The effect of age and gender was assessed using multivariate logistic regression. A total of 3537 patients had a first nitrofurantoin prescription in 2015; 506 men and 3031 women. Overall, 584 patients (17%) experienced nitrofurantoin failure; 135 (27%) men and 449 (15%) women. Male gender (odds ratio (OR) = 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.68–2.61) and age (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03) was associated with higher treatment failure. Our findings indicate that in a substantial number of elderly men, nitrofurantoin might not be the appropriate treatment. Nitrofurantoin, as a first choice in elderly men with urinary tract infections, should be reconsidered.

Original languageEnglish
Article number211
Number of pages5
JournalAntibiotics
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Apr 2020

Keywords

  • Anti-bacterial agents
  • Elderly
  • Nitrofurantoin
  • Primary care
  • Treatment failure
  • Urinary tract infections

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nitrofurantoin failure in elderly men: A retrospective observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this