Network Meta-Analysis Techniques for Synthesizing Prevention Science Evidence

G. Seitidis*, S. Nikolakopoulos, Ea Hennessy, Ee Tanner-Smith, D. Mavridis

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Network meta-analysis is a popular statistical technique for synthesizing evidence from studies comparing multiple interventions. Benefits of network meta-analysis, over more traditional pairwise meta-analysis approaches, include evaluating efficacy/safety of interventions within a single framework, increased precision, comparing pairs of interventions that have never been directly compared in a trial, and providing a hierarchy of interventions in terms of their effectiveness. Network meta-analysis is relatively underutilized in prevention science. This paper therefore presents a primer of network meta-analysis for prevention scientists who wish to apply this method or to critically appraise evidence from publications using the method. We introduce the key concepts and assumptions of network meta-analysis, namely, transitivity and consistency, and demonstrate their applicability to the field of prevention science. We then illustrate the method using a network meta-analysis examining the comparative effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions for preventing hazardous drinking among college students. We provide data and code for all examples. Finally, we discuss considerations that are particularly relevant in network meta-analyses in the field of prevention, such as including non-randomized evidence.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)415-424
    Number of pages10
    JournalPrevention Science
    Volume23
    Issue number3
    Early online date13 Aug 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

    Keywords

    • Consistency
    • Network Meta-Analysis
    • Prevention science
    • Ranking
    • Transitivity
    • Tutorial

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Network Meta-Analysis Techniques for Synthesizing Prevention Science Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this