TY - JOUR
T1 - Nerve ultrasound
T2 - A reproducible diagnostic tool in peripheral neuropathy
AU - Telleman, Johan A.
AU - Herraets, Ingrid J.T.
AU - Goedee, H. Stephan
AU - Verhamme, Camiel
AU - Nikolakopoulos, Stavros
AU - Van Asseldonk, Jan Thies H.
AU - Van Der Pol, W. Ludo
AU - Van Den Berg, Leonard H.
AU - Visser, Leo H.
PY - 2019/1/29
Y1 - 2019/1/29
N2 - Objective To determine interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy in a prospective, systematic, multicenter study. Methods We enrolled 20 patients with an acquired chronic demyelinating or axonal polyneuropathy and 10 healthy controls in 3 different centers. All participants underwent an extensive nerve ultrasound protocol, including cross-sectional area measurements of median, ulnar, fibular, tibial, and sural nerves, and brachial plexus. Real-time image acquisition was performed blind by a local and a visiting investigator (reference). Five patients were investigated using different types of sonographic devices. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated, and a random-effects model was fitted to identify factors with significant effect on interobserver variability. Results Systematic differences between measurements made by different investigators were small (mean difference 0.11 mm2 [95% confidence interval 0.00-0.23 mm2]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were generally higher in arm nerves (0.48-0.96) than leg nerves (0.46-0.61). The hospital site and sonographic device did not contribute significantly to interobserver variability in the random-effects model. Conclusions Interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy is generally limited, especially in arm nerves. Different devices and a multicenter setting have no effect on interobserver variability. Therefore, nerve ultrasound is a reproducible tool for diagnostics in routine clinical practice and (multicenter) research.
AB - Objective To determine interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy in a prospective, systematic, multicenter study. Methods We enrolled 20 patients with an acquired chronic demyelinating or axonal polyneuropathy and 10 healthy controls in 3 different centers. All participants underwent an extensive nerve ultrasound protocol, including cross-sectional area measurements of median, ulnar, fibular, tibial, and sural nerves, and brachial plexus. Real-time image acquisition was performed blind by a local and a visiting investigator (reference). Five patients were investigated using different types of sonographic devices. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated, and a random-effects model was fitted to identify factors with significant effect on interobserver variability. Results Systematic differences between measurements made by different investigators were small (mean difference 0.11 mm2 [95% confidence interval 0.00-0.23 mm2]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were generally higher in arm nerves (0.48-0.96) than leg nerves (0.46-0.61). The hospital site and sonographic device did not contribute significantly to interobserver variability in the random-effects model. Conclusions Interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy is generally limited, especially in arm nerves. Different devices and a multicenter setting have no effect on interobserver variability. Therefore, nerve ultrasound is a reproducible tool for diagnostics in routine clinical practice and (multicenter) research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065538291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006856
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006856
M3 - Article
C2 - 30593519
AN - SCOPUS:85065538291
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 92
SP - E443-E450
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 5
ER -