TY - JOUR
T1 - Neonatal cranial ultrasound versus MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome at school age in children born preterm
AU - Rademaker, K.J.
AU - Uiterwaal, C.S.P.M.
AU - Beek, F.J.A.
AU - van Haastert, I.C.
AU - Lieftink, A
AU - Groenendaal, F.
AU - Grobbee, D.E.
AU - de Vries, L.S.
PY - 2005/11
Y1 - 2005/11
N2 - Aim: To examine the correlation between neonatal cranial ultrasound and school age magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neurodevelopmental outcome. Methods: In a prospective 2 year cohort study, 221 children (gestational age ≤ 32 weeks and/or birth weight ≤ 1500 g) participated at a median age of 8.1 years (inclusion percentage 78%). Conventional MRI, IQ (subtests of the WISC), and motor performance (Movement Assessment Battery for Children) at school age were primary outcome measurements. Results: Overall, there was poor correspondence between ultrasound group classifications and MRI group classifications, except for the severe group (over 70% agreement). There was only a 1% chance of the children with a normal cranial ultrasound having a major lesion on MRI. Mean IQ (standard deviation) was significantly lower in children with major ultrasound or MRI lesions, but was also lower in children with minor lesions on MRI compared to children with a normal MRI (91 ± 16, 100 ± 13, 104 ± 13 for major lesions, minor lesions, and normal MRI, respectively). Median total impairment score (TIS) was significantly higher in children with major lesions on ultrasound or MRI as well as in children with minor lesions on MRI (TIS 4.0 and 6.25 for normal and minor lesions on MRI, respectively; p
AB - Aim: To examine the correlation between neonatal cranial ultrasound and school age magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neurodevelopmental outcome. Methods: In a prospective 2 year cohort study, 221 children (gestational age ≤ 32 weeks and/or birth weight ≤ 1500 g) participated at a median age of 8.1 years (inclusion percentage 78%). Conventional MRI, IQ (subtests of the WISC), and motor performance (Movement Assessment Battery for Children) at school age were primary outcome measurements. Results: Overall, there was poor correspondence between ultrasound group classifications and MRI group classifications, except for the severe group (over 70% agreement). There was only a 1% chance of the children with a normal cranial ultrasound having a major lesion on MRI. Mean IQ (standard deviation) was significantly lower in children with major ultrasound or MRI lesions, but was also lower in children with minor lesions on MRI compared to children with a normal MRI (91 ± 16, 100 ± 13, 104 ± 13 for major lesions, minor lesions, and normal MRI, respectively). Median total impairment score (TIS) was significantly higher in children with major lesions on ultrasound or MRI as well as in children with minor lesions on MRI (TIS 4.0 and 6.25 for normal and minor lesions on MRI, respectively; p
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644592348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/adc.2005.073908
DO - 10.1136/adc.2005.073908
M3 - Article
C2 - 15956095
SN - 1359-2998
VL - 90
SP - 489
EP - 493
JO - Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition
JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition
IS - 6
ER -