TY - JOUR
T1 - Natural history and clinical characteristics of inhibitors in previously treated haemophilia A patients
T2 - a case series
AU - Iorio, A.
AU - Barbara, A. M.
AU - Makris, M.
AU - Fischer, K.
AU - Castaman, G.
AU - Catarino, C.
AU - Gilman, E.
AU - Kavakli, K.
AU - Lambert, T.
AU - Lassila, R.
AU - Lissitchkov, T.
AU - Mauser-Bunschoten, E.
AU - Mingot-Castellano, M. E.
AU - Ozdemir, N.
AU - Pabinger, I.
AU - Parra, R.
AU - Pasi, J.
AU - Peerlinck, K.
AU - Rauch, A.
AU - Roussel-Robert, V.
AU - Serban, M.
AU - Tagliaferri, A.
AU - Windyga, J.
AU - Zanon, E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by two independent unrestricted research grants: a ‘Care until Cure’ peer reviewed research grant, awarded in 2013 to AMB by the Canadian Hemophilia Society (CHS) supported the collection of inhibitor data reported in the literature; a Pfizer Investigator-Initiated Research grant awarded in 2014 to AI supported the collection of data reported to EUHASS. We thank the following people for providing data for the study: Dr, Prasad Mathew from Albuquerque, USA; Dr. Jenny Goudemand from Lille, France; Dr. Sylvia Reitter-Pfoertner from Vienna, Austria; Dr. Gianna F. Rivolta from Parma, Italy; Dr. Vadim Romanov from California, USA (at the time of data analysis); Dr. Bülent Zülfikar from Istanbul, Turkey.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - Background: Development of inhibitors is the most serious complication in haemophilia A treatment. The assessment of risk for inhibitor formation in new or modified factor concentrates is traditionally performed in previously treated patients (PTPs). However, evidence on risk factors for and natural history of inhibitors has been generated mostly in previously untreated patients (PUPs). The purpose of this study was to examine cases of de novo inhibitors in PTPs reported in the scientific literature and to the EUropean HAemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) programme, and explore determinants and course of inhibitor development. Methods: We used a case series study design and developed a case report form to collect patient level data; including detection, inhibitor course, treatment, factor VIII products used and events that may trigger inhibitor development (surgery, vaccination, immune disorders, malignancy, product switch). Results: We identified 19 publications that reported 38 inhibitor cases and 45 cases from 31 EUHASS centres. Individual patient data were collected for 55/83 (66%) inhibitor cases out of 12 330 patients. The median (range) peak inhibitor titre was 4.4 (0.5–135.0), the proportion of transient inhibitors was 33% and only two cases of 12 undergoing immune tolerance induction failed this treatment. In the two months before inhibitor development, surgery was reported in nine (22%) cases, and high intensity treatment periods reported in seven (17%) cases. Conclusions: By studying the largest cohort of inhibitor development in PTPs assembled to date, we showed that inhibitor development in PTPs, is on average, a milder event than in PUPs.
AB - Background: Development of inhibitors is the most serious complication in haemophilia A treatment. The assessment of risk for inhibitor formation in new or modified factor concentrates is traditionally performed in previously treated patients (PTPs). However, evidence on risk factors for and natural history of inhibitors has been generated mostly in previously untreated patients (PUPs). The purpose of this study was to examine cases of de novo inhibitors in PTPs reported in the scientific literature and to the EUropean HAemophilia Safety Surveillance (EUHASS) programme, and explore determinants and course of inhibitor development. Methods: We used a case series study design and developed a case report form to collect patient level data; including detection, inhibitor course, treatment, factor VIII products used and events that may trigger inhibitor development (surgery, vaccination, immune disorders, malignancy, product switch). Results: We identified 19 publications that reported 38 inhibitor cases and 45 cases from 31 EUHASS centres. Individual patient data were collected for 55/83 (66%) inhibitor cases out of 12 330 patients. The median (range) peak inhibitor titre was 4.4 (0.5–135.0), the proportion of transient inhibitors was 33% and only two cases of 12 undergoing immune tolerance induction failed this treatment. In the two months before inhibitor development, surgery was reported in nine (22%) cases, and high intensity treatment periods reported in seven (17%) cases. Conclusions: By studying the largest cohort of inhibitor development in PTPs assembled to date, we showed that inhibitor development in PTPs, is on average, a milder event than in PUPs.
KW - factor VIII inhibitors
KW - haemophilia A
KW - previously treated patients
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013300912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/hae.13167
DO - 10.1111/hae.13167
M3 - Article
C2 - 28205285
AN - SCOPUS:85013300912
SN - 1351-8216
VL - 23
SP - 255
EP - 263
JO - Haemophilia
JF - Haemophilia
IS - 2
ER -