MRI versus CT for detecting cartilage invasion in patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Inge Wegner*, Lotty Hooft, Johannes B. Reitsma, Frank A. Pameijer, Remco de Bree, Inge Stegeman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows: To determine and compare the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative conventional MRI and conventional CT for detecting cartilage invasion in patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, who have not previously undergone surgery, using histopathology as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy may vary depending on the methodological quality of the study, study population and technical characteristics of the index test and reference test. Therefore, we will assess whether heterogeneity in sensitivity and/or specificity can be related to: methodological quality rating for the four QUADAS-2 domains (low risk of bias versus high risk of bias versus unclear risk of bias); previous radiotherapeutic treatment (yes versus no); sublocation distribution (glottic versus supraglottic versus subglottic versus hypopharyngeal); type of cartilage assessed (thyroid versus cricoid versus arytenoid); T-classification distribution; N-classification distribution; magnetic field strength used (1.5 Tesla versus 3.0 Tesla); slice thickness imaging; slice thickness pathology; diagnostic criteria used/differences in (qualitative) thresholds.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD012115
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Volume2016
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MRI versus CT for detecting cartilage invasion in patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this