TY - CHAP
T1 - Modeling Multicomponent Interventions in Network Meta-Analysis
AU - Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
AU - Seitidis, Georgios
AU - Nikolakopoulos, Stavros
AU - Ballester, Marta
AU - Beltran, Jessica
AU - Heijmans, Monique
AU - Mavridis, Dimitris
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - There is a rapid increase in trials assessing healthcare interventions consisting of a combination of drugs (polytherapies) or multiple components. In the latter type of interventions (also known as complex interventions), the aspect of complexity is of paramount importance. For example, nonpharmacological interventions, such as psychological interventions or self-management interventions, usually share common components that relate to the nature of intervention, who delivers it, or where and how. In a network of trials, there is often the need to identify the most effective (or safest) component and/or combination of components. Four key meta-analytical approaches have been presented in the literature to handle complex interventions. These include (a) the single-effect model, (b) the full interaction model, (c) the additive main effects model, and (d) the two-way interaction model. In this chapter, we present and discuss the advantages and limitations of these approaches. We illustrate these methods using a network that assesses the relative effects of self-management interventions on waist size in patients with type 2 diabetes.
AB - There is a rapid increase in trials assessing healthcare interventions consisting of a combination of drugs (polytherapies) or multiple components. In the latter type of interventions (also known as complex interventions), the aspect of complexity is of paramount importance. For example, nonpharmacological interventions, such as psychological interventions or self-management interventions, usually share common components that relate to the nature of intervention, who delivers it, or where and how. In a network of trials, there is often the need to identify the most effective (or safest) component and/or combination of components. Four key meta-analytical approaches have been presented in the literature to handle complex interventions. These include (a) the single-effect model, (b) the full interaction model, (c) the additive main effects model, and (d) the two-way interaction model. In this chapter, we present and discuss the advantages and limitations of these approaches. We illustrate these methods using a network that assesses the relative effects of self-management interventions on waist size in patients with type 2 diabetes.
KW - Additive effects
KW - Combination therapies
KW - Complex interventions
KW - Component network meta-analysis
KW - Multiple treatment meta-analysis
KW - Self-management interventions
KW - Humans
KW - Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
KW - Network Meta-Analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116086379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_15
DO - 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_15
M3 - Chapter
C2 - 34550595
VL - 2345
T3 - Methods in Molecular Biology
SP - 245
EP - 261
BT - Methods in Molecular Biology
PB - Humana Press Inc.
ER -