Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Minder risico's, patiëntenongemak en kosten, maar niet minder zwangerschappen in de milde behandelstrategie voor ivf

Translated title of the contribution: Reduction of patient discomfort, risks and costs, but not pregnancies, by a mild strategy for in-vitro fertilisation
  • E.M.E.W. Heijnen
  • , M.J. Eijkemans
  • , C. de Klerk
  • , S. Polinder
  • , N.G. Beckers
  • , E.R. Klinkert
  • , F.J.M. Broekmans
  • , J. Passchier
  • , E.R. te Velde
  • , N.S. Macklon
  • , B.C.J.M. Fauser

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective. To compare a so-called mild in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment strategy with the standard IVF treatment on the following aspects: the chance of a pregnancy resulting in full-term live birth within 1 year, patient discomfort, multiple pregnancies, and costs. Design. Randomised, open-label, prospective trial (www.controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN35766970). Method. 404 patients were assigned to undergo either a mild treatment, consisting of ovarian stimulation with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist combined with single embryo transfer, or the standard treatment consisting of prolonged stimulation with a GnRH agonist combined with the transfer of two embryos. The primary outcome measures were: (1) the percentage of cumulative pregnancies within one year after randomisation leading to full-term live birth; (2) total costs per couple and child up to 6 weeks after expected delivery; and (3) overall patient discomfort. Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle and was intended to show that the mild treatment was not inferior to the standard treatment; the non-inferiority threshold was -12.5%. Results. The proportion of cumulative pregnancies resulting in full-term live birth after 1 year was 43.4% in the mild and 44.7% in the standard treatment group. The lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval was equal to -9.8%. The respective proportion of couples with multiple pregnancies was 0.5% versus 13.1% (p < 0.0001), and the average total costs were € 8,333.- versus € 10,745.- (difference: € 2,412.-, 95% CI: 703-4,131). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regard to anxiety, depression, physical discomfort, and sleep quality. Conclusion. After 1 year of treatment, the cumulative percentage of pregnancies leading to full-term live birth and the total patient discomfort were the same for the mild treatment (average 2.3 IVF-cycles) and the standard treatment (average 1.7 IVF-cycles). The mild treatment significantly reduced the number of multiple pregnancies and the overall costs.

    Translated title of the contributionReduction of patient discomfort, risks and costs, but not pregnancies, by a mild strategy for in-vitro fertilisation
    Original languageDutch
    Pages (from-to)809-816
    Number of pages8
    JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
    Volume152
    Issue number14
    Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2008

    Keywords

    • Econometric and Statistical Methods: General
    • Geneeskunde(GENK)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reduction of patient discomfort, risks and costs, but not pregnancies, by a mild strategy for in-vitro fertilisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this