Minder risico's, patiëntenongemak en kosten, maar niet minder zwangerschappen in de milde behandelstrategie voor ivf

Translated title of the contribution: Reduction of patient discomfort, risks and costs, but not pregnancies, by a mild strategy for in-vitro fertilisation

E.M.E.W. Heijnen, M.J. Eijkemans, C. de Klerk, S. Polinder, N.G. Beckers, E.R. Klinkert, F.J.M. Broekmans, J. Passchier, E.R. te Velde, N.S. Macklon, B.C.J.M. Fauser

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective. To compare a so-called mild in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment strategy with the standard IVF treatment on the following aspects: the chance of a pregnancy resulting in full-term live birth within 1 year, patient discomfort, multiple pregnancies, and costs. Design. Randomised, open-label, prospective trial (www.controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN35766970). Method. 404 patients were assigned to undergo either a mild treatment, consisting of ovarian stimulation with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist combined with single embryo transfer, or the standard treatment consisting of prolonged stimulation with a GnRH agonist combined with the transfer of two embryos. The primary outcome measures were: (1) the percentage of cumulative pregnancies within one year after randomisation leading to full-term live birth; (2) total costs per couple and child up to 6 weeks after expected delivery; and (3) overall patient discomfort. Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle and was intended to show that the mild treatment was not inferior to the standard treatment; the non-inferiority threshold was -12.5%. Results. The proportion of cumulative pregnancies resulting in full-term live birth after 1 year was 43.4% in the mild and 44.7% in the standard treatment group. The lower limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval was equal to -9.8%. The respective proportion of couples with multiple pregnancies was 0.5% versus 13.1% (p < 0.0001), and the average total costs were € 8,333.- versus € 10,745.- (difference: € 2,412.-, 95% CI: 703-4,131). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regard to anxiety, depression, physical discomfort, and sleep quality. Conclusion. After 1 year of treatment, the cumulative percentage of pregnancies leading to full-term live birth and the total patient discomfort were the same for the mild treatment (average 2.3 IVF-cycles) and the standard treatment (average 1.7 IVF-cycles). The mild treatment significantly reduced the number of multiple pregnancies and the overall costs.

    Translated title of the contributionReduction of patient discomfort, risks and costs, but not pregnancies, by a mild strategy for in-vitro fertilisation
    Original languageDutch
    Pages (from-to)809-816
    Number of pages8
    JournalNederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde
    Volume152
    Issue number14
    Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2008

    Keywords

    • Econometric and Statistical Methods: General
    • Geneeskunde(GENK)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reduction of patient discomfort, risks and costs, but not pregnancies, by a mild strategy for in-vitro fertilisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this