Mid-term outcomes of three commonly used surgical reconstructions for scapholunate instability

Robert J. van Kampen*, J. Henk Coert, Steven L. Moran

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This retrospective analysis reports the mid-term (>2 years) outcomes of capsulodesis, (modified) Brunelli tenodesis and bone-ligament-bone reconstruction for scapholunate ligament instability. In total, 60 patients (64 wrists) returned the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaires. Of these participants, 42 (46 wrists) returned for a wrist examination and radiographs. In the questionnaire group, the mean follow-up for capsulodesis was 11.8 years, tenodesis 5.9 years and bone-ligament-bone 8.9 years. In the objective outcomes group, the mean follow-up was 10.2 years for capsulodesis, 5.7 for tenodesis and 8.9 for bone-ligament-bone. In all groups, some patients showed radiographic deterioration, which did not always correlate with poor functional outcome. With a mean follow-up greater than 5 years, there was no substantial difference in clinical outcomes and patient-based outcome questionnaires between capsulodesis, tenodesis or bone-ligament-bone reconstruction for the treatment of scapholunate instability. This study emphasizes the need for further research. Surgeons should use the technique that produces the fewest complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)852-858
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Hand Surgery: European Volume
Volume49
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • bone-ligament-bone
  • Brunelli
  • capsulodesis
  • scapholunate
  • tenodesis
  • Wrist

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mid-term outcomes of three commonly used surgical reconstructions for scapholunate instability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this