Mechanisms of ear trauma and reconstructive techniques in 105 consecutive patients

Michail N. Kolodzynski*, Moshe Kon, Silvan Egger, Corstiaan C. Breugem

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Acquired auricular deformities may diminish facial esthetics and cause psychological distress. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the type of injuries and applied reconstructive techniques in a large academic hospital in The Netherlands. A retrospective chart review was conducted for the last 105 patients who underwent auricular reconstruction for an acquired deformity. Data concerning gender, affected side, cause of injury, anatomical region, the previous and further surgeries, type of cartilage, and skin cover used were collected and analyzed. 105 patients were included. Acquired auricular deformities were mainly caused by bite injuries (22 %), traffic accidents (17 %), burns (9.5 %), and post-otoplasty complications (9.5 %). The upper third of the auricle was most often injured (41 %), followed by the entire auricle (19 %). 70 % of cases required reconstruction with costal cartilage. The most common form of cutaneous cover was a postauricular skin flap (40 % of cases). This study gives a complete overview of causes and treatment of acquired auricular deformities. The results are comparable with the results of similar studies found in literature. Bite wounds are the leading cause of acquired auricular injuries. The upper third is most commonly affected. In the largest percentage of reconstructions, costal cartilage and a postauricular flap were used to correct the deformity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)723–728
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Volume274
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Keywords

  • Auricular defect
  • Costal cartilage
  • Ear reconstruction
  • Traumatic ear amputation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanisms of ear trauma and reconstructive techniques in 105 consecutive patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this