Measuring standardised mortality ratios of hospitals: Challenges and recommendations

M.E. Pouw

    Research output: ThesisDoctoral thesis 1 (Research UU / Graduation UU)

    Abstract

    Objectives of this thesis

    This thesis has the following objectives:
    - To study the effects of ‘referral bias’ and ‘casemix and coding issues’
    on the current Dutch HSMR calculation.
    - To identify potential adjustments in the estimation of the HSMR to
    improve its validity as a performance indicator.

    Outline of this thesis

    The thesis starts with investigating the theoretical method underlying the
    calculation of the HSMR, the so-called indirect standardisation method. In
    chapter 2, the indirect standardisation method is compared with the direct
    standardisation method. Also, pitfalls of HSMR resulting from the indirect
    standardisation method are discussed, and recommendations are given to
    reduce the shortcomings of this method.
    Subsequently, the thesis investigates potential modifications of the currently
    used model for HSMR calculation. To adjust for casemix differences
    between hospitals, parameters of comorbidities are included in the model
    underlying the HSMR calculation. In chapter 3, the commonly used Charlson
    comorbidity measure is compared with the Elixhauser comorbidity measure.
    Discriminative performance of the casemix correction models based on these
    two comorbidity measures is compared and their effects on the HSMRs of
    individual hospitals are explored.
    The Dutch HSMR is currently based on in-hospital mortality. However,
    discharge patterns, average length of hospital stay, and transfers all affect inhospital
    mortality. In chapter 4, effects of the inclusion of post-discharge
    mortality on HSMRs are compared with those of in-hospital mortality.
    In the final part of the thesis we zoom in onto the mortality ratios of specific
    patient populations, rather than that of an entire hospital population. In
    chapter 5, the focus is on SMRs of specific diagnosis groups requiring specialised
    care offered by specialised hospitals. The SMRs of specialised and nonspecialised
    hospitals are compared and the influence of referral patterns on
    SMRs is investigated.
    Current HSMR calculation is based on administrative databases and said to
    lack important clinical predictors. In chapter 6, the casemix adjustment model
    for cardiac surgery patients, based on an administrative database, is compared
    with the validated clinical EuroSCORE prediction model, based on a clinical database. Also influences of the two models on eventual SMRs are compared.
    Finally, in chapter 7, the results and implications of this thesis are summarised and discussed together with insights and recommendations to improve the validity and utility of HSMRs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Awarding Institution
    • University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht
    Supervisors/Advisors
    • Kalkman, CJ, Primary supervisor
    • Moons, Carl, Supervisor
    • Peelen, LM, Co-supervisor
    Publisher
    Print ISBNs978-90-393-66776
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Nov 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring standardised mortality ratios of hospitals: Challenges and recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this