TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring Signs of Atopic Dermatitis in Clinical Practice
T2 - A HOME-CP Consensus Statement
AU - Jacobson, Michael E.
AU - Leshem, Yael A.
AU - Apfelbacher, Christian
AU - Spuls, Phyllis I.
AU - Gerbens, Louise
AU - Thomas, Kim S.
AU - Williams, Hywel C.
AU - Katoh, Norito
AU - Howells, Laura
AU - Schmitt, Jochen
AU - Deckert, Stefanie
AU - Seshadri, Rishi
AU - Simpson, Eric
AU - Lanigan, Mike
AU - Ishii, Henrique Akira
AU - Gabes, Michaela
AU - Volke, Annika
AU - Haft, Michael
AU - Arlert, Petra
AU - Stadler, Jean Francois
AU - Fitzgerald, Allison
AU - Lee, Wan Ju
AU - Leshem, Yael
AU - Gallardo, William Romero
AU - Thibau, Isabelle
AU - Montmayeur, Sonia
AU - Feeney, Claire
AU - Cohee, Andrea
AU - Spuls, Phyllis
AU - Gerbens, Louise
AU - Steffensen, Louise
AU - Shipowick, Tammi
AU - Begolka, Wendy Smith
AU - Van Der Rijst, Lisa
AU - Paller, Amy
AU - Denault, Julianne
AU - De Graaf, Marlies
AU - Rincon-Perez, Catalina
AU - Achten, Roselie
AU - Wollenberg, Andreas
AU - De Bruin-Weller, Marjolein
AU - Marcoux, Danielle
AU - Eichenfield, Lawrence
AU - Simpson, Eric
AU - Apfelbacher, Christian
AU - Jacobson, Michael
AU - Jack, Carolyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/8/1
Y1 - 2024/8/1
N2 - Importance: Outcome measurement is an essential component of value-based health care and can aid patient care, quality improvement, and clinical effectiveness evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Clinical Practice initiative aims to identify a list of validated, feasible, outcome measurement instruments recommended to measure atopic dermatitis (AD) in the clinical practice setting. The clinical practice set is a list of instruments that clinicians can pick and choose from to suit their needs in the context of clinical care. Objective: To recommend instruments to measure clinical signs of AD in clinical practice. Evidence Review: Following the predefined roadmap, a mixed methods design was implemented and incorporated systematic reviews and qualitative consensus methods. Previous systematic reviews identified few clinical signs instruments with sufficient validation for recommendation. An updated systematic review evaluating the validity of clinical signs instruments informed an international meeting to reach consensus on recommended instruments to measure AD clinical signs in clinical practice. Consensus was defined as less than 30% disagreement. An in-person consensus exercise was held in Montreal, Canada, on October 16, 2022. The 34 attendees included patient and patient advocate research partners, health care professionals, researchers, methodologists, and industry representatives. Findings: The updated systematic review found that the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis, and objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis were the only instruments that demonstrated sufficient performance in all assessed measurement properties. The modified EASI and Signs Global Assessment × Body Surface Area instruments were also recommended. The EASI, Validated Investigator Global Assessment, and Investigator's Global Assessment multiplied by or measured concurrently with a body surface area measure achieved consensus in criteria and were adopted. Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus statement by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative suggests that when assessing and documenting clinical signs of AD, there are several valid and feasible instruments that can best fit a clinician's specific practice needs. These instruments should improve and standardize the documentation of signs severity, help determine the effect of treatment, facilitate the generation of clinical effectiveness evidence, and enhance the implementation of value-based health care.
AB - Importance: Outcome measurement is an essential component of value-based health care and can aid patient care, quality improvement, and clinical effectiveness evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema Clinical Practice initiative aims to identify a list of validated, feasible, outcome measurement instruments recommended to measure atopic dermatitis (AD) in the clinical practice setting. The clinical practice set is a list of instruments that clinicians can pick and choose from to suit their needs in the context of clinical care. Objective: To recommend instruments to measure clinical signs of AD in clinical practice. Evidence Review: Following the predefined roadmap, a mixed methods design was implemented and incorporated systematic reviews and qualitative consensus methods. Previous systematic reviews identified few clinical signs instruments with sufficient validation for recommendation. An updated systematic review evaluating the validity of clinical signs instruments informed an international meeting to reach consensus on recommended instruments to measure AD clinical signs in clinical practice. Consensus was defined as less than 30% disagreement. An in-person consensus exercise was held in Montreal, Canada, on October 16, 2022. The 34 attendees included patient and patient advocate research partners, health care professionals, researchers, methodologists, and industry representatives. Findings: The updated systematic review found that the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis, and objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis were the only instruments that demonstrated sufficient performance in all assessed measurement properties. The modified EASI and Signs Global Assessment × Body Surface Area instruments were also recommended. The EASI, Validated Investigator Global Assessment, and Investigator's Global Assessment multiplied by or measured concurrently with a body surface area measure achieved consensus in criteria and were adopted. Conclusions and Relevance: This consensus statement by the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative suggests that when assessing and documenting clinical signs of AD, there are several valid and feasible instruments that can best fit a clinician's specific practice needs. These instruments should improve and standardize the documentation of signs severity, help determine the effect of treatment, facilitate the generation of clinical effectiveness evidence, and enhance the implementation of value-based health care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194430362&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1162
DO - 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.1162
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38776110
AN - SCOPUS:85194430362
SN - 2168-6068
VL - 160
SP - 878
EP - 886
JO - JAMA Dermatology
JF - JAMA Dermatology
IS - 8
ER -