TY - JOUR
T1 - Masticatory function in edentulous patients wearing implant overdentures after graftless maxillary sinus membrane elevation
AU - Lie, Suen A.N.
AU - Speksnijder, Caroline M.
AU - Kalic, Haris
AU - Kessler, Peter A.W.H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Background: Graftless sinus floor augmentation shows good results in bone gain, radiology and implant survival. Clinically, this technique can be recommended as an alternative to conventional procedures using augmentation materials. Objectives: This study aims to assess masticatory performance, masticatory ability and patient satisfaction after graftless sinus floor augmentation. Methods: The study group consisted of patients who had received a graftless sinus lift procedure in a split-mouth design and was compared to patients with maxillary implant-supported overdentures without augmentation and a natural dentition group. To assess objective masticatory performance, the mixing ability test was performed. Three questionnaires were used to assess patient reported outcomes related to mastication and patient satisfaction. Results: Each group included ten patients. Both the graftless sinus lift group and the edentulous control group had a worse masticatory performance compared to the natural dentition group. Masticatory ability, measured by patient reported outcomes, was not different between the graftless sinus floor augmentation group and implant-retained overdentures group without augmentation, but the natural dentition group showed better results. Thereby, the better the masticatory performance in patients with a graftless sinus membrane elevation the better the patient satisfaction for ‘prosthesis’, ‘appearance of prostheses’, ‘speech’ and ‘mastication and eating’. Conclusions: Patients with implant-supported overdentures show inferior masticatory function compared to those with natural dentition. There were no significant differences in masticatory performance between patients with implant-retained overdentures, with or without graftless augmentation. The decision on the preferred procedure should consider additional factors such as anatomical, surgical-technical aspects and patient's preferences.
AB - Background: Graftless sinus floor augmentation shows good results in bone gain, radiology and implant survival. Clinically, this technique can be recommended as an alternative to conventional procedures using augmentation materials. Objectives: This study aims to assess masticatory performance, masticatory ability and patient satisfaction after graftless sinus floor augmentation. Methods: The study group consisted of patients who had received a graftless sinus lift procedure in a split-mouth design and was compared to patients with maxillary implant-supported overdentures without augmentation and a natural dentition group. To assess objective masticatory performance, the mixing ability test was performed. Three questionnaires were used to assess patient reported outcomes related to mastication and patient satisfaction. Results: Each group included ten patients. Both the graftless sinus lift group and the edentulous control group had a worse masticatory performance compared to the natural dentition group. Masticatory ability, measured by patient reported outcomes, was not different between the graftless sinus floor augmentation group and implant-retained overdentures group without augmentation, but the natural dentition group showed better results. Thereby, the better the masticatory performance in patients with a graftless sinus membrane elevation the better the patient satisfaction for ‘prosthesis’, ‘appearance of prostheses’, ‘speech’ and ‘mastication and eating’. Conclusions: Patients with implant-supported overdentures show inferior masticatory function compared to those with natural dentition. There were no significant differences in masticatory performance between patients with implant-retained overdentures, with or without graftless augmentation. The decision on the preferred procedure should consider additional factors such as anatomical, surgical-technical aspects and patient's preferences.
KW - chewing performance
KW - masticatory function
KW - mixing ability test
KW - quality of life
KW - sinus floor augmentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187487743&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/joor.13675
DO - 10.1111/joor.13675
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85187487743
SN - 0305-182X
VL - 51
SP - 1005
EP - 1015
JO - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
IS - 6
ER -